Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by STEVEN JAY FRANK and KATHERINE A HUTCHESON.
Connection Strength

2.758
  1. Evaluating Observer Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-LEFAT Criteria for Post-Treatment Head and Neck Lymphedema: A Prospective Blinded Comparative Analysis of Oncologist Human Inter-Rater Performance. medRxiv. 2024 Sep 18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.987
  2. Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A 12-Year, Single-Institution Experience. Int J Part Ther. 2021; 8(1):108-118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  3. Prospective longitudinal patient-reported outcomes of swallowing following intensity modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2020 07; 148:133-139.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  4. Comparing Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy With Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Journey From Clinical Trial Concept to Activation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018 04; 28(2):108-113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  5. Intensity-modulated proton therapy and osteoradionecrosis in oropharyngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2017 06; 123(3):401-405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  6. Assessing head and neck cancer patient preferences and expectations: A systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2016 11; 62:44-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  7. Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Disease Recurrence After Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):360-367.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  8. Mandibular dose-volume predicts time-to-osteoradionecrosis in an actuarial normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) model: External validation of right-censored clinico-dosimetric and competing risk application across international multi-institutional observational cohorts and online graphical user interface clinical support tool assessment. medRxiv. 2024 Aug 20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  9. Temporal characterization of acute pain and toxicity kinetics during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. A retrospective study. Oral Oncol Rep. 2023 Sep; 7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  10. 18FDG positron emission tomography mining for metabolic imaging biomarkers of radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jul; 29:93-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  11. Conditional survival among patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with radiation therapy and alive without recurrence 5 years after diagnosis. Cancer. 2021 04 15; 127(8):1228-1237.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  12. Patterns of Failure After Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Implication of Elective Nodal and Mucosal Dose Coverage. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep-Oct; 5(5):929-935.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  13. Neurologic sequelae following radiation with and without chemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: Patient reported outcomes study. Head Neck. 2020 08; 42(8):2137-2144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  14. Radiation-Induced Hypothyroidism After Radical Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan-Feb; 5(1):111-119.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  15. Outcomes of carotid-sparing IMRT for T1 glottic cancer: Comparison with conventional radiation. Laryngoscope. 2020 01; 130(1):146-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  16. Author Correction: Imaging and clinical data archive for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy. Sci Data. 2018 11 27; 5(1):1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  17. Predicting treatment Response based on Dual assessment of magnetic resonance Imaging kinetics and Circulating Tumor cells in patients with Head and Neck cancer (PREDICT-HN): matching 'liquid biopsy' and quantitative tumor modeling. BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 19; 18(1):903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  18. Imaging and clinical data archive for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy. Sci Data. 2018 09 04; 5:180173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  19. Three-dimensional imaging assessment of anatomic invasion and volumetric considerations for chemo/radiotherapy-based laryngeal preservation in T3 larynx cancer. Oral Oncol. 2018 04; 79:1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  20. Outcomes of patients diagnosed with carcinoma metastatic to the neck from an unknown primary source and treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Cancer. 2018 04 01; 124(7):1415-1427.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  21. Patient reported dry mouth: Instrument comparison and model performance for correlation with quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol. 2018 01; 126(1):75-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  22. Cognitive function and patient-reported memory problems after radiotherapy for cancers at the skull base: A cross-sectional survivorship study using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck Module. Head Neck. 2017 10; 39(10):2048-2056.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  23. Quantitative pretreatment CT volumetry: Association with oncologic outcomes in patients with T4a squamous carcinoma of the larynx. Head Neck. 2017 08; 39(8):1609-1620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  24. Long-term outcomes after multidisciplinary management of T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas: Improved functional outcomes and survival with modern therapeutic approaches. Head Neck. 2016 12; 38(12):1739-1751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  25. Association of Body Composition With Survival and Locoregional Control of Radiotherapy-Treated Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jun 01; 2(6):782-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  26. Magnetic resonance imaging of swallowing-related structures in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving IMRT: Longitudinal dose-response characterization of quantitative signal kinetics. Radiother Oncol. 2016 Feb; 118(2):315-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.