STEVEN JAY FRANK to Head and Neck Neoplasms
This is a "connection" page, showing publications STEVEN JAY FRANK has written about Head and Neck Neoplasms.
Connection Strength
6.545
-
Comprehensive insights on the underlying potential and advantage of proton therapy over intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy as highlighted in a wide real world data analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2024 04; 193:110122.
Score: 0.308
-
Biology of the Radio- and Chemo-Responsiveness in HPV Malignancies. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2021 10; 31(4):274-285.
Score: 0.262
-
Proton and photon radiosensitization effects of niraparib, a PARP-1/-2 inhibitor, on human head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2020 09; 42(9):2244-2256.
Score: 0.237
-
Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jan; 21(1):166-173.
Score: 0.231
-
Patterns of protein expression in human head and neck cancer cell lines differ after proton vs photon radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2020 02; 42(2):289-301.
Score: 0.230
-
Proton versus photon radiation-induced cell death in head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2019 01; 41(1):46-55.
Score: 0.216
-
Radiation-Related Alterations of Taste Function in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: a Systematic Review. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 11 09; 19(12):72.
Score: 0.215
-
Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018 01; 28(1):53-63.
Score: 0.202
-
Assessing head and neck cancer patient preferences and expectations: A systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2016 11; 62:44-53.
Score: 0.186
-
Toward a model-based patient selection strategy for proton therapy: External validation of photon-derived normal tissue complication probability models in a head and neck proton therapy cohort. Radiother Oncol. 2016 12; 121(3):381-386.
Score: 0.185
-
Reduced acute toxicity and improved efficacy from intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the management of head and neck cancer. Chin Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug; 5(4):54.
Score: 0.183
-
Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Tumors: Gilding the Lily or Holy Grail? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):37-39.
Score: 0.180
-
Reirradiation of Head and Neck Cancers With Proton Therapy: Outcomes and Analyses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 09 01; 96(1):30-41.
Score: 0.179
-
Definitive proton radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin for unresectable head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: A series of 9 cases and a critical review of the literature. Head Neck. 2016 04; 38 Suppl 1:E1472-80.
Score: 0.174
-
Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
Score: 0.157
-
Proton radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a review of the clinical experience to date. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jun 01; 89(2):292-302.
Score: 0.157
-
Oncology scan--demonstrating technology and measuring outcomes in head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 15; 88(4):759-60.
Score: 0.155
-
Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison. Med Dosim. 2013; 38(4):390-4.
Score: 0.149
-
Proton beam radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies. Curr Oncol Rep. 2010 May; 12(3):202-7.
Score: 0.119
-
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical node squamous cell carcinoma metastases from unknown head-and-neck primary site: M. D. Anderson Cancer Center outcomes and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Nov 15; 78(4):1005-10.
Score: 0.118
-
Technology insight: PET and PET/CT in head and neck tumor staging and radiation therapy planning. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005 Oct; 2(10):526-33.
Score: 0.086
-
Deep learning-based statistical robustness evaluation of intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2024 Sep 20; 69(19).
Score: 0.081
-
The Case for Allowing Proton Beam Therapy on Head and Neck Cooperative Group Studies. JAMA Oncol. 2024 Mar 01; 10(3):289-290.
Score: 0.077
-
Changes in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in Serial Weekly MRI during Radiotherapy in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Results from the PREDICT-HN Study. Curr Oncol. 2022 08 31; 29(9):6303-6313.
Score: 0.070
-
The influence of radiation dose on taste impairment in a prospective observational study cohort of oropharyngeal cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2022 Feb; 61(2):146-152.
Score: 0.067
-
Impact of RBE variations on risk estimates of temporal lobe necrosis in patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol. 2022 Feb; 61(2):215-222.
Score: 0.065
-
Stereotactic body ablative radiotherapy for reirradiation of small volume head and neck cancers is associated with prolonged survival: Large, single-institution, modern cohort study. Head Neck. 2021 11; 43(11):3331-3344.
Score: 0.065
-
Mixed Effect Modeling of Dose and Linear Energy Transfer Correlations With Brain Image Changes After Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Skull Base Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 11 01; 111(3):684-692.
Score: 0.064
-
Outcomes of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation compared with those treated with concurrent chemoradiation. Cancer. 2021 08 15; 127(16):2916-2925.
Score: 0.064
-
Bioelectrical impedance analysis as a quantitative measure of sarcopenia in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2021 06; 159:21-27.
Score: 0.063
-
Dosimetric impact of commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms and a novel in-house algorithm for proton therapy of head and neck cancer. Med Phys. 2021 Jan; 48(1):445-455.
Score: 0.062
-
Development and validation of a contouring guideline for the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa. Radiother Oncol. 2021 04; 157:63-69.
Score: 0.062
-
Highly conformal reirradiation in patients with prior oropharyngeal radiation: Clinical efficacy and toxicity outcomes. Head Neck. 2020 11; 42(11):3326-3335.
Score: 0.061
-
Outcomes and patterns of radiation associated brain image changes after proton therapy for head and neck skull base cancers. Radiother Oncol. 2020 10; 151:119-125.
Score: 0.060
-
A prospective parallel design study testing non-inferiority of customized oral stents made using 3D printing or manually fabricated methods. Oral Oncol. 2020 07; 106:104665.
Score: 0.059
-
Data from a terminated study on iron oxide nanoparticle magnetic resonance imaging for head and neck tumors. Sci Data. 2020 02 21; 7(1):63.
Score: 0.059
-
Surveillance imaging for patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: A partially observed Markov decision process model. Cancer. 2020 02 15; 126(4):749-756.
Score: 0.058
-
Estimating PTV Margins in Head and Neck Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) Through Target Site Analysis of Positioning and Intrafractional Accuracy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 01 01; 106(1):185-193.
Score: 0.057
-
Multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive optimization method to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers. Radiother Oncol. 2020 01; 142:124-132.
Score: 0.057
-
Creating customized oral stents for head and neck radiotherapy using 3D scanning and printing. Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug 19; 14(1):148.
Score: 0.057
-
Nomogram to Predict the Benefit of Intensive Treatment for Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 12 01; 25(23):7078-7088.
Score: 0.057
-
Minocycline for symptom reduction during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jan; 28(1):261-269.
Score: 0.055
-
Usefulness of surveillance imaging in patients with head and neck cancer who are treated with definitive radiotherapy. Cancer. 2019 06 01; 125(11):1823-1829.
Score: 0.055
-
The Insurance Approval Process for Proton Radiation Therapy: A Significant Barrier to Patient Care. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 07 15; 104(4):724-733.
Score: 0.054
-
Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) - The future of IMRT for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2019 01; 88:66-74.
Score: 0.054
-
Predicting treatment Response based on Dual assessment of magnetic resonance Imaging kinetics and Circulating Tumor cells in patients with Head and Neck cancer (PREDICT-HN): matching 'liquid biopsy' and quantitative tumor modeling. BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 19; 18(1):903.
Score: 0.053
-
Imaging and clinical data archive for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy. Sci Data. 2018 09 04; 5:180173.
Score: 0.053
-
Outcomes of patients diagnosed with carcinoma metastatic to the neck from an unknown primary source and treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Cancer. 2018 04 01; 124(7):1415-1427.
Score: 0.051
-
Patient reported dry mouth: Instrument comparison and model performance for correlation with quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol. 2018 01; 126(1):75-80.
Score: 0.050
-
Patterns of locoregional failure following post-operative intensity-modulated radiotherapy to oral cavity cancer: quantitative spatial and dosimetric analysis using a deformable image registration workflow. Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug 15; 12(1):129.
Score: 0.049
-
Clinical outcomes after local field conformal reirradiation of patients with retropharyngeal nodal metastasis. Head Neck. 2017 10; 39(10):2079-2087.
Score: 0.049
-
Human papillomavirus status and the relative biological effectiveness of proton radiotherapy in head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2017 04; 39(4):708-715.
Score: 0.047
-
Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Peer Review Quality Assurance Rounds Incorporating Direct Physical Examination for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 07 01; 98(3):532-540.
Score: 0.047
-
Long-term outcomes after multidisciplinary management of T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas: Improved functional outcomes and survival with modern therapeutic approaches. Head Neck. 2016 12; 38(12):1739-1751.
Score: 0.046
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Glucose Uptake and Metabolism in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Sci Rep. 2016 07 27; 6:30618.
Score: 0.046
-
Association of Body Composition With Survival and Locoregional Control of Radiotherapy-Treated Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jun 01; 2(6):782-9.
Score: 0.045
-
Reirradiation of Head and Neck Cancers With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Outcomes and Analyses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 07 15; 95(4):1117-31.
Score: 0.045
-
Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging kinetics during chemoradiotherapy for human papillomavirus-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: preliminary results from a prospective pilot study. NMR Biomed. 2015 Dec; 28(12):1645-54.
Score: 0.043
-
Comparative costs of advanced proton and photon radiation therapies: lessons from time-driven activity-based costing in head and neck cancer. J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Aug; 4(4):297-301.
Score: 0.043
-
Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Favorable outcomes with radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2016 04; 38 Suppl 1:E452-8.
Score: 0.043
-
Phase I study of vandetanib with radiation therapy with or without cisplatin in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2016 Mar; 38(3):439-47.
Score: 0.042
-
Prospective observer and software-based assessment of magnetic resonance imaging quality in head and neck cancer: Should standard positioning and immobilization be required for radiation therapy applications? Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jul-Aug; 5(4):e299-308.
Score: 0.041
-
Quality assurance assessment of diagnostic and radiation therapy-simulation CT image registration for head and neck radiation therapy: anatomic region of interest-based comparison of rigid and deformable algorithms. Radiology. 2015 Mar; 274(3):752-63.
Score: 0.041
-
Nomogram for predicting symptom severity during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct; 151(4):619-26.
Score: 0.040
-
Beam path toxicity in candidate organs-at-risk: assessment of radiation emetogenesis for patients receiving head and neck intensity modulated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2014 May; 111(2):281-8.
Score: 0.039
-
Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer. Med Phys. 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709.
Score: 0.037
-
Auto-segmentation of low-risk clinical target volume for head and neck radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan-Feb; 4(1):e31-7.
Score: 0.037
-
Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers. Med Phys. 2013 May; 40(5):051711.
Score: 0.037
-
High symptom burden prior to radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a patient-reported outcomes study. Head Neck. 2013 Oct; 35(10):1490-8.
Score: 0.035
-
Prospective risk-adjusted [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography assessment of radiation response in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 20; 27(15):2509-15.
Score: 0.028
-
Quantifying the accuracy of deformable image registration for cone-beam computed tomography with a physical phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Oct; 20(10):92-100.
Score: 0.014
-
Radiographic retropharyngeal lymph node involvement in HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma: Patterns of involvement and impact on patient outcomes. Cancer. 2019 05 01; 125(9):1536-1546.
Score: 0.014
-
Quantitative analysis of treatment process time and throughput capacity for spot scanning proton therapy. Med Phys. 2016 Jul; 43(7):3975.
Score: 0.011
-
PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization. Med Phys. 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709.
Score: 0.009