Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by CHARLES E BUTLER and MARK VICTOR SCHAVERIEN.
CHARLES E BUTLER
Connection Strength
4.339
MARK VICTOR SCHAVERIEN
  1. Hot Topics in Reconstructive Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 05 01; 147(5):1245-1247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.781
  2. Outcomes of Vascularized Lymph Node Transplantation for Treatment of Lymphedema. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 06; 232(6):982-994.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.775
  3. Building a Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Academic Lymphedema Program. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar; 8(3):e2670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.723
  4. Complications in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Unilateral and Bilateral Reconstructions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun; 24(6):1451-1453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.584
  5. Outcomes of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction After Oncologic Resection: 14-Year Experience at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun; 30(6):3712-3720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  6. Harnessing the synergy of perfusable muscle flap matrix and adipose-derived stem cells for prevascularization and macrophage polarization to reconstruct volumetric muscle loss. Bioact Mater. 2023 Apr; 22:588-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  7. Authors' response to: "Comment on the impact of sarcopenia on oncologic abdominal wall reconstruction". J Surg Oncol. 2021 02; 123(2):696-697.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  8. Factors Correlating With Microsurgical Performance: A Clinical and Experimental Study. J Surg Educ. 2018 Jul - Aug; 75(4):1045-1051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  9. Interview Scores Correlate with Fellow Microsurgical Skill and Performance. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Mar; 34(3):211-217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  10. Comparison of Live Rat Femoral Artery Model with Intraoperative Microvascular Anastomosis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 Nov; 33(9):641-648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  11. Advanced age does not affect abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes using acellular dermal matrix: A comparative study using propensity score analysis. Am J Surg. 2017 Jun; 213(6):1046-1052.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  12. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of 694 Two-Stage Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 10 01; 152(4S):43S-54S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  13. Ensuring Safety While Achieving Beauty: An Evidence-Based Approach to Optimizing Mastectomy and Autologous Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients with Obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 09 01; 237(3):441-451.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  14. Is Tissue Expansion Worth It? Comparative Outcomes of Skin-preserving versus Delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Nov; 8(11):e3217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  15. The impact of sarcopenia on oncologic abdominal wall reconstruction. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec; 122(7):1490-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  16. Using a Second Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap after Repeated Mandibulectomy Is Associated with a Low Complication Rate and Acceptable Functional Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Aug; 140(2):381-389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.