Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by CHARLES E BUTLER and EDWARD I-FEI CHANG.
Connection Strength

4.836
  1. Reply: Defining the Role of Secondary Intention Healing in Full-Thickness Lid Margin Defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 05; 141(5):786e-787e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.661
  2. Eyelid Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov; 140(5):724e-735e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.639
  3. Management of Unfavorable Outcomes in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: Experience-Based Lessons from the MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clin Plast Surg. 2016 Oct; 43(4):653-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.580
  4. Cephalic Vein Transposition versus Vein Grafts for Venous Outflow in Free-flap Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 May; 2(5):e141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.505
  5. Comparison of Long-term Surgical Outcomes and Microsurgical Skills between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Trainees. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Mar; 11(3):e4709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  6. Outcomes of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction After Oncologic Resection: 14-Year Experience at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun; 30(6):3712-3720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.229
  7. No Differences in Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes among AlloDerm, SurgiMend, and Dermacell for Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 05 01; 151(5):719e-729e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  8. Harnessing the synergy of perfusable muscle flap matrix and adipose-derived stem cells for prevascularization and macrophage polarization to reconstruct volumetric muscle loss. Bioact Mater. 2023 Apr; 22:588-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  9. A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Different Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 11 01; 150(5):955-962.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  10. The Profunda Artery Perforator Flap: A Versatile Option for Head and Neck Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 01; 147(6):1401-1412.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  11. A Randomized Prospective Time and Motion Comparison of Techniques to Process Autologous Fat Grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 01; 147(5):1035-1044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  12. Building a Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Academic Lymphedema Program. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar; 8(3):e2670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  13. A Prospective Pilot Study Comparing Rate of Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Grafting. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 02 15; 39(3):331-337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  14. Decellularized skin/adipose tissue flap matrix for engineering vascularized composite soft tissue flaps. Acta Biomater. 2016 Apr 15; 35:166-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  15. Engineering vascularized soft tissue flaps in an animal model using human adipose-derived stem cells and VEGF+PLGA/PEG microspheres on a collagen-chitosan scaffold with a flow-through vascular pedicle. Biomaterials. 2015 Dec; 73:198-213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  16. Tracking the learning curve in microsurgical skill acquisition. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Oct; 130(4):550e-557e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  17. Ensuring Safety While Achieving Beauty: An Evidence-Based Approach to Optimizing Mastectomy and Autologous Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients with Obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 09 01; 237(3):441-451.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  18. The Effect of Lipoaspirate Processing Technique on Complications in Autologous Fat Grafting for Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 09 14; 41(10):NP1303-NP1309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  19. Outcome Analysis of Free Flap Salvage in Outpatients Presenting with Microvascular Compromise. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 01; 141(1):20e-27e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.