Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by CHARLES E BUTLER and JESSE CREED SELBER.
CHARLES E BUTLER
Connection Strength
9.870
JESSE CREED SELBER
  1. Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul; 136(1):10-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.543
  2. Correlation between trainee candidate selection criteria and subsequent performance. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov; 219(5):951-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.511
  3. Tracking the learning curve in microsurgical skill acquisition. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Oct; 130(4):550e-557e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.449
  4. Discussion: the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May; 129(5):1059-1060.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.436
  5. Frail but Resilient: Frailty in Autologous Breast Reconstruction is Associated with Worse Surgical Outcomes but Equivalent Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan; 31(1):659-671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  6. The Skin Necrosis Conundrum: Examining Long-term Outcomes and Risk Factors in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Oct 13; 43(11):NP898-NP907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  7. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of 694 Two-Stage Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 10 01; 152(4S):43S-54S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  8. Impact of Obesity on Outcomes of Prepectoral vs Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 09 14; 43(10):NP774-NP786.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  9. Outcomes of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Biologic Mesh in Patients with 8 Years of Follow-Up. World J Surg. 2023 Dec; 47(12):3175-3181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  10. Decoding the Mastectomy SKIN Score: An Evaluation of Its Predictive Performance in Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jun 07.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  11. Ensuring Safety While Achieving Beauty: An Evidence-Based Approach to Optimizing Mastectomy and Autologous Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients with Obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 09 01; 237(3):441-451.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  12. Subpectoral Implant Placement Is Not Protective against Postmastectomy Radiotherapy-Related Complications Compared to Prepectoral Placement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 01 01; 153(1):24-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  13. Introduction of the L-PAP Flap: Bipedicled, Conjoined, and Stacked Thigh-Based Flaps for Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 12 01; 152(6):1005e-1010e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  14. Comparison of Long-term Surgical Outcomes and Microsurgical Skills between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Trainees. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Mar; 11(3):e4709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  15. Artificial Intelligence Modeling to Predict Periprosthetic Infection and Explantation following Implant-Based Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 11 01; 152(5):929-938.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  16. Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with a Bovine versus a Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 10 01; 152(4):872-881.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  17. ASO Author Reflections: Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Biologic Mesh Following Extirpative Oncologic Resection Results in Outcomes Comparable to Ventral Hernia Repair. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 06; 30(6):3721-3722.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.229
  18. Outcomes of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction After Oncologic Resection: 14-Year Experience at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun; 30(6):3712-3720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.229
  19. No Differences in Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes among AlloDerm, SurgiMend, and Dermacell for Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 05 01; 151(5):719e-729e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  20. Surgical Outcomes of Implant versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Previous Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 02 01; 151(2):190e-199e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  21. Master's Degrees Among Academic Plastic Surgeons and Plastic Surgery Residents: What Are the Trends? Ann Plast Surg. 2022 11 01; 89(5):478-486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  22. Does a Latissimus Dorsi Flap Improve Surgical Outcomes of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction following Infected Device Explantation? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Aug; 10(8):e4409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  23. Outcomes of Autologous Free Flap Reconstruction Following Infected Device Explantation. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2023 Jun; 39(5):327-333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  24. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction following Infected Device Explantation: Is a Second Attempt Worth It? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 08 01; 150(2):247e-259e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  25. Comparison of Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Performed by Surgical Fellows vs Faculty. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 05 02; 5(5):e2212444.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  26. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Autologous versus Implant-Based Reconstruction following Infected Breast Device Explantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 06 01; 149(6):1080e-1089e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  27. Robotic DIEP Patient Selection: Analysis of CT Angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Dec; 9(12):e3970.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  28. Robotic Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap following Robotic Extirpative Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Dec 01; 148(6):1377-1381.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  29. Outcomes of Vascularized Lymph Node Transplantation for Treatment of Lymphedema. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 06; 232(6):982-994.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  30. Building a Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Academic Lymphedema Program. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar; 8(3):e2670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  31. Synthetic Mesh Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix for Oncologic Chest Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 27(8):3009-3017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  32. Factors Correlating With Microsurgical Performance: A Clinical and Experimental Study. J Surg Educ. 2018 Jul - Aug; 75(4):1045-1051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  33. Interview Scores Correlate with Fellow Microsurgical Skill and Performance. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Mar; 34(3):211-217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  34. A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Visible Light Spectroscopy to Handheld Doppler for Postoperative Free Tissue Transfer Monitoring. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep; 140(3):604-613.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  35. Comparison of Live Rat Femoral Artery Model with Intraoperative Microvascular Anastomosis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 Nov; 33(9):641-648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  36. Robotic microsurgery: validating an assessment tool and plotting the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct; 134(4):794-803.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  37. Bovine versus Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparison of Mechanical Properties. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 May; 2(5):e155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  38. Reply: To PMID 24083910. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May; 218(5):1081-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  39. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  40. Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan; 131(1):71-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  41. Impact of Predatory Journals in Plastic Surgery Literature: Researchers Beware. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 06 01; 149(6):1234e-1243e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  42. Comparing Donor Site Morbidity for Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Thigh vs. Abdomen. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar; 10(3):e4215.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  43. Development and Assessment of Machine Learning Models for Individualized Risk Assessment of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis. Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 01; 278(1):e123-e130.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  44. Allograft vs Xenograft Bioprosthetic Mesh in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Blinded Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 11 12; 41(12):NP1931-NP1939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  45. Self-Reported Risk Factors for Financial Distress and Attitudes Regarding Cost Discussions in Cancer Care: A Single-Institution Cross-Sectional Pilot Study of Breast Reconstruction Recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 04 01; 147(4):587e-595e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  46. Development of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Financial Toxicity in Localized Breast Cancer Following Surgical Treatment. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 03; 5:338-347.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  47. Exploring provider- and practice-level drivers of cost-consciousness in breast cancer reconstruction-secondary analysis of a survey of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jun; 187(2):569-576.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  48. Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction with Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 02 15; 39(3):279-288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  49. US FDA Breast Implant Postapproval Studies: Long-term Outcomes in 99,993 Patients. Ann Surg. 2019 01; 269(1):30-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  50. Aseptic Freeze-Dried versus Sterile Wet-Packaged Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 05; 141(5):624e-632e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  51. Outcome Analysis of Free Flap Salvage in Outpatients Presenting with Microvascular Compromise. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 01; 141(1):20e-27e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  52. U.S. Epidemiology of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May; 139(5):1042-1050.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  53. Salvaging the Infected Breast Tissue Expander: A Standardized Multidisciplinary Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jun; 4(6):e732.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.