Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by PEDRO TOMAS RAMIREZ and MICHAEL FRUMOVITZ.
PEDRO TOMAS RAMIREZ
Connection Strength
14.658
MICHAEL FRUMOVITZ
  1. International Gynecologic Cancer Society 2019 meeting summary. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 02; 30(2):167-173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.716
  2. Optimizing sentinel node identification: a step toward novel tools and improved strategies--exciting times are here! J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Feb; 22(2):153-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.502
  3. Sentinel nodes in cervical cancer: surgical innovation outside the ivory towers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun; 22(6):1759-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.501
  4. Lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer study (LiLACS): Phase III clinical trial comparing surgical with radiologic staging in patients with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb; 21(1):3-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.456
  5. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: an established benefit no longer in question. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug; 20(4):401-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  6. Minimally invasive surgical approaches for patients with endometrial cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun; 54(2):226-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.393
  7. Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul; 114(1):93-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.344
  8. Radical hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct; 112(4):899-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.327
  9. Laparoscopy training in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Nov; 111(2):197-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.326
  10. Fertility preservation in patients with early cervical cancer: radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S25-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.318
  11. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S21-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.318
  12. Puntambekar et Al. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Mar-Apr; 15(2):254-5; author reply 255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.314
  13. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.299
  14. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Aug; 106(2):433-4; author reply 435.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.297
  15. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: surgical technique and instrumentation. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Feb; 104(2 Suppl 1):13-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.288
  16. Accuracy of pre-operative tumor size assessment compared to final pathology and frequency of adjuvant treatment in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Oct 23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  17. LACC Trial: Final Analysis on Overall Survival Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 10; 42(23):2741-2746.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  18. Consensus on surgical technique for sentinel lymph node dissection in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Apr 01; 34(4):504-509.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  19. Sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green using SPY-PHI in open radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Jan 05; 34(1):28-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  20. Open radical hysterectomy: The new standard of care in early-stage cervical cancer. BJOG. 2023 07; 130(8):851-855.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  21. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 06; 21(6):851-860.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  22. COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Options for Management of Gynecologic Cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 05; 30(5):561-563.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  23. Reproductive counseling and pregnancy outcomes after radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May; 30(3):e45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  24. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15; 379(20):1895-1904.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  25. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Nov - Dec; 25(7):1224-1230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  26. Sentinel lymph node mapping in minimally invasive surgery: Role of imaging with color-segmented fluorescence (CSF). Gynecol Oncol. 2017 09; 146(3):676-677.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  27. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 04; 145(1):96-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  28. Utility of indocyanine green (ICG) intra-operative angiography to determine uterine vascular perfusion at the time of radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Nov; 143(2):357-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  29. Role of cervical cytology in surveillance after radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 08; 142(2):283-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  30. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Jul; 25(6):1121-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  31. Make New Friends But Keep the Old: Minimally Invasive Surgery Training in Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Programs. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Jul; 25(6):1115-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  32. Significance of lymph node ratio in defining risk category in node-positive early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jan; 136(1):48-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  33. Clinically significant endometrial cancer risk following a diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec; 135(3):451-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  34. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation: should it stay or should it go? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Feb; 22(2):185-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  35. Physician pain and discomfort during minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Aug; 134(2):243-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  36. A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Feb; 132(2):366-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  37. A case for caution in the pursuit of the sentinel node in women with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Feb; 132(2):275-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  38. Successful incorporation of robotic surgery into gynecologic oncology fellowship training. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Dec; 131(3):730-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  39. Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care? Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan; 132(1):254-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  40. Venous thromboembolic events in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Nov-Dec; 20(6):766-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  41. Postoperative outcomes after continent versus incontinent urinary diversion at the time of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jun; 129(3):580-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  42. Analgesic and antiemetic requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer: a comparison between laparoscopy and robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr; 20(4):1355-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  43. Anatomic location of PET-positive aortocaval nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: implications for surgical staging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Sep; 22(7):1203-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  44. "Triple injection" lymphatic mapping technique to determine if parametrial nodes are the true sentinel lymph nodes in women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Dec; 127(3):467-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  45. Utility of conization with frozen section for intraoperative triage prior to definitive hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov; 127(2):307-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  46. Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. JSLS. 2012 Jul-Sep; 16(3):503-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  47. Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Sep; 126(3):428-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  48. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the cervix in adult women and younger patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Sep; 126(3):351-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  49. Impact of smoking on perioperative pulmonary and upper respiratory complications after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun; 125(3):556-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  50. Impact of surgeon volume on patient safety in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr; 125(1):241-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  51. Comparison of single-port laparoscopy, standard laparoscopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 May; 19(5):1583-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  52. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology's Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Feb; 124(2):180-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  53. Fertility sparing surgery for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: open vs. robotic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Feb; 124(2):276-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  54. Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Nov; 123(2):333-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  55. Rate of port-site metastasis is uncommon in patients undergoing robotic surgery for gynecological malignancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Jul; 21(5):936-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  56. Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: is there a role for less radical surgery? Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Mar; 120(3):321-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  57. Outcomes of patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer of high-risk histological subtypes. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Jan; 21(1):123-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  58. Primary malignant melanoma of the vagina. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec; 116(6):1358-1365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  59. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings. Cancer. 2011 May 01; 117(9):1928-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  60. Limited utility of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the primary site of disease in patients with inconclusive endometrial biopsy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Nov; 20(8):1344-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  61. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: review of literature and available technology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Jan-Feb; 18(1):12-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  62. Risk of thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct; 116(4):956-961.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  63. Rate of vaginal cuff separation following laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Jan; 120(1):47-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  64. Rate of para-aortic lymph node micrometastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Dec; 119(3):422-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  65. Conservative surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: what percentage of patients may be eligible for conization and lymphadenectomy? Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Nov; 119(2):183-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  66. Prevalence of lymph node metastasis in primary mucinous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug; 116(2 Pt 1):269-273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  67. Microscopic evaluation of lymph-node-bearing tissue in early-stage cervical cancer: a dual-institution review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr; 17(4):1106-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  68. Trends in laparoscopic and robotic surgery among gynecologic oncologists: A survey update. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Mar; 112(3):501-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  69. Preoperative pathologic findings associated with residual disease at radical hysterectomy in women with stage IA2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jan; 112(1):110-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  70. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct; 15(5):584-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  71. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node detection in women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S17-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  72. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node detection in women with vaginal cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Mar; 108(3):478-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  73. Adenosquamous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy: an outcomes analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Dec; 107(3):458-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  74. Preoperative lymph-vascular space invasion is associated with nodal metastases in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jul; 106(1):12-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  75. Usefulness of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in patients who undergo radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr; 194(4):1186-93; discussion 1193-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  76. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node detection in gynecologic malignancies of the lower genital tract. Curr Oncol Rep. 2005 Nov; 7(6):435-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  77. Well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma of the peritoneum: a pathological analysis and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Jul; 98(1):161-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  78. Metastatic carcinoma of the gallbladder mimicking an advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Jun; 97(3):942-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  79. Hormonal therapy for the management of grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma: a literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Oct; 95(1):133-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  80. Laparoscopic training and practice in gynecologic oncology among Society of Gynecologic Oncologists members and fellows-in-training. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Sep; 94(3):746-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  81. Characteristics of recurrence in patients who underwent lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Jan; 92(1):205-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  82. PARa-aOrtic LymphAdenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer (PAROLA trial): a GINECO, ENGOT, and GCIG study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 02 06; 33(2):293-298.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  83. Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer. J Immunother Precis Oncol. 2023 Feb; 6(1):10-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  84. Impact of timing of urinary catheter removal on voiding dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Jul 08.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  85. ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 10; 31(10):1317-1325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  86. Fertility considerations prior to conservative management of gynecologic cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 03; 31(3):339-344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  87. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2020 07 01; 6(7):1019-1027.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  88. Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 06; 30(6):873-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  89. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 03; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  90. Preoperative PET/CT does not accurately detect extrauterine disease in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk endometrial cancer: A prospective study. Cancer. 2019 10 01; 125(19):3347-3353.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  91. Perineural invasion (PNI) in vulvar carcinoma: A review of 421 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 01; 152(1):101-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  92. Simple trachelectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy as a viable treatment option in pregnant patients with stage IB1 (=2?cm) cervical cancer: Bridging the gap to fetal viability. Gynecol Oncol. 2018 07; 150(1):50-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  93. The influence of surgeon volume on outcomes after pelvic exenteration for a gynecologic cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Sep; 29(5):e68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  94. Radical parametrectomy after 'cut-through' hysterectomy in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: Time to consider this procedure obsolete. Gynecol Oncol. 2018 06; 149(3):520-524.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  95. A prospective validation study of sentinel lymph node mapping for high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 08; 146(2):234-239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  96. Role of Indocyanine Green in Sentinel Node Mapping in Gynecologic Cancer: Is Fluorescence Imaging the New Standard? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Feb 01; 23(2):186-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  97. Impact of Lymph Node Ratio and Adjuvant Therapy in Node-Positive Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Oct; 25(8):1437-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  98. Lymphovascular Space Invasion Portends Poor Prognosis in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Sep; 25(7):1292-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  99. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  100. Radical Trachelectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Survey of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecologic Oncology Fellows-in-Training. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May; 25(4):681-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  101. Overall survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Sep; 134(3):546-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  102. Summary of the 2014 MD Anderson International Meeting in Gynecologic Oncology: emerging therapies in gynecologic cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jul; 134(1):6-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  103. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: does operative start time impact surgical and oncologic outcomes? Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Aug; 134(2):248-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  104. Pelvic exenteration: impact of age on surgical and oncologic outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan; 132(1):114-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  105. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates following the implementation of extended duration prophylaxis for patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb; 128(2):204-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  106. The effect of body mass index on surgical outcomes and survival following pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May; 125(2):336-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  107. Quality of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in developing countries: a comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between a comprehensive cancer center in the United States and a cancer center in Colombia. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May; 125(2):326-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  108. Proceedings from the 9th International Conference on Ovarian Cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr; 125(1):5-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  109. Modified vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vaginal reconstruction: an analysis of surgical outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr; 125(1):252-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  110. Lymphadenectomy during endometrial cancer staging: practice patterns among gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Nov; 119(2):291-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  111. Pelvic fractures after radiotherapy for cervical cancer: implications for survivors. Cancer. 2010 Feb 01; 116(3):625-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  112. Sentinel node mapping in vulvovaginal melanoma using SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. 2009 Dec; 34(12):859-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  113. Retroperitoneal lymph node resection in patients with cervical cancer. Surg Oncol. 2006 Aug; 15(2):79-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  114. Are women ready for the HPV vaccine? Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Oct; 103(1):151-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  115. Electrothermal bipolar coagulation for pelvic exenterations. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Sep; 102(3):534-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.