Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by THOMAS A BUCHHOLZ and ISABELLE BEDROSIAN.
Connection Strength

0.567
  1. Implications of constructed biologic subtype and its relationship to locoregional recurrence following mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res. 2012 May 23; 14(3):R82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  2. Locoregional treatment outcomes for breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases at diagnosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Feb 01; 67(2):490-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  3. Optimizing Patient Positioning to Reduce Variation in the Measurement of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 08; 17(4):440-446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  4. Use of regional nodal irradiation and its association with survival for women with high-risk, early stage breast cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jul-Sep; 2(3):291-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  5. Practical Implications of the Publication of Consensus Guidelines by the American Society for Radiation Oncology: Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation and the National Cancer Data Base. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Feb 01; 94(2):338-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  6. Impact of chemotherapy sequencing on local-regional failure risk in breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg. 2013 Feb; 257(2):173-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  7. Impact of internal mammary lymph node drainage identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy on outcomes in patients with stage I to III breast cancer. Cancer. 2012 Dec 15; 118(24):6287-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  8. Local-regional control according to surrogate markers of breast cancer subtypes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2012 May 23; 14(3):R83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  9. Multidisciplinary considerations in the implementation of the findings from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 study: a practice-changing trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep; 18(9):2407-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  10. Evaluation of the MD Anderson Prognostic Index for local-regional recurrence after breast conserving therapy in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar; 19(3):901-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  11. Classification of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast conservation therapy can predict patient prognosis and facilitate treatment planning. Ann Surg. 2011 Mar; 253(3):572-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  12. Present-day locoregional control in patients with t1 or t2 breast cancer with 0 and 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes after mastectomy without radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Nov; 17(11):2899-908.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  13. Automatic segmentation of whole breast using atlas approach and deformable image registration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Apr 01; 73(5):1493-500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  14. Risk of subclinical micrometastatic disease in the supraclavicular nodal bed according to the anatomic distribution in patients with advanced breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jun 01; 71(2):435-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  15. Long-term outcomes in patients with mucinous, medullary, tubular, and invasive ductal carcinomas after lumpectomy. Am J Surg. 2007 Oct; 194(4):527-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  16. Outcomes of breast-conservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma are equivalent to those for invasive ductal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2006 Oct; 192(4):552-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  17. Predictors of systemic recurrence and disease-specific survival after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Cancer. 2005 Aug 01; 104(3):479-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  18. Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 14; 347(20):1566-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.