Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JEFFREY N MYERS and VLAD SANDULACHE.
Connection Strength

3.571
  1. Residual nodal disease in patients with advanced-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive radiation therapy and posttreatment neck dissection: Association with locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and decreased survival. Head Neck. 2013 Oct; 35(10):1454-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.449
  2. Individualizing antimetabolic treatment strategies for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma based on TP53 mutational status. Cancer. 2012 Feb 01; 118(3):711-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.412
  3. Altered metabolism in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an opportunity for identification of novel biomarkers and drug targets. Head Neck. 2012 Feb; 34(2):282-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.401
  4. Glucose, not glutamine, is the dominant energy source required for proliferation and survival of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Cancer. 2011 Jul 01; 117(13):2926-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.399
  5. Dysregulation and Epigenetic Reprogramming of NRF2 Signaling Axis Promote Acquisition of Cisplatin Resistance and Metastasis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 04 03; 29(7):1344-1359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  6. Evolution of cisplatin resistance through coordinated metabolic reprogramming of the cellular reductive state. Br J Cancer. 2023 06; 128(11):2013-2024.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  7. Acquisition of Cisplatin Resistance Shifts Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Metabolism toward Neutralization of Oxidative Stress. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 24; 12(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  8. High-Risk TP53 Mutations Are Associated with Extranodal Extension in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 04 01; 24(7):1727-1733.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  9. Metabolic interrogation as a tool to optimize chemotherapeutic regimens. Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 14; 8(11):18154-18165.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  10. Acute Tumor Lactate Perturbations as a Biomarker of Genotoxic Stress: Development of a Biochemical Model. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Dec; 14(12):2901-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  11. Gain-of-function mutant p53 promotes cell growth and cancer cell metabolism via inhibition of AMPK activation. Mol Cell. 2014 Jun 19; 54(6):960-974.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  12. Association between metformin use and improved survival in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2014 Jul; 36(7):1039-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  13. Integration of cancer genomics with treatment selection: from the genome to predictive biomarkers. Cancer. 2013 Nov 15; 119(22):3914-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  14. Glycolytic inhibition alters anaplastic thyroid carcinoma tumor metabolism and improves response to conventional chemotherapy and radiation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Jun; 11(6):1373-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  15. TP53 disruptive mutations lead to head and neck cancer treatment failure through inhibition of radiation-induced senescence. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 01; 18(1):290-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  16. Disruptive TP53 mutation is associated with aggressive disease characteristics in an orthotopic murine model of oral tongue cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Nov 01; 17(21):6658-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  17. FAK Drives Resistance to Therapy in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer in a p53-Dependent Manner. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 01 05; 30(1):187-197.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  18. Metformin use and improved response to therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun; 52(5):1002-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  19. Phosphoproteomic analysis of signaling pathways in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patient samples. Am J Pathol. 2011 Feb; 178(2):548-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.