Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JEFFREY E GERSHENWALD and JANICE NICOLE CORMIER.
Connection Strength
2.712
-
The long-term risk of upper-extremity lymphedema is two-fold higher in breast cancer patients than in melanoma patients. J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec; 112(8):834-40.
Score: 0.133
-
Is surviving enough? Coping and impact on activities of daily living among melanoma patients with lymphoedema. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Sep; 24(5):724-33.
Score: 0.127
-
Prospective assessment of lymphedema incidence and lymphedema-associated symptoms following lymph node surgery for melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2013 Aug; 23(4):290-7.
Score: 0.114
-
Variability in melanoma post-treatment surveillance practices by country and physician specialty: a systematic review. Melanoma Res. 2012 Oct; 22(5):376-85.
Score: 0.107
-
Mapping FACT-melanoma quality-of-life scores to EQ-5D health utility weights. Value Health. 2011 Sep-Oct; 14(6):900-6.
Score: 0.098
-
Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jan 19; 103(2):129-42.
Score: 0.094
-
Conditional survival estimates improve over time for patients with advanced melanoma: results from a population-based analysis. Cancer. 2010 May 01; 116(9):2234-41.
Score: 0.091
-
Conditional survival estimates improve over 5 years for melanoma survivors with node-positive disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Aug; 17(8):2015-23.
Score: 0.090
-
Prospective assessment of postoperative complications and associated costs following inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct; 17(10):2764-72.
Score: 0.090
-
Lymph node ratio predicts disease-specific survival in melanoma patients. Cancer. 2009 Jun 01; 115(11):2505-13.
Score: 0.085
-
Microscopic tumor burden in sentinel lymph nodes predicts synchronous nonsentinel lymph node involvement in patients with melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep 10; 26(26):4296-303.
Score: 0.080
-
Fibrin sealant does not decrease seroma output or time to drain removal following inguino-femoral lymph node dissection in melanoma patients: a randomized controlled trial (NCT00506311). World J Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun 18; 6:63.
Score: 0.080
-
Prospective assessment of the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma questionnaire. Cancer. 2008 May 15; 112(10):2249-57.
Score: 0.079
-
Adjuvant high-dose interferon for cutaneous melanoma is most beneficial for patients with early stage III disease. Cancer. 2008 May 01; 112(9):2030-7.
Score: 0.079
-
Pelvic lymph node dissection is beneficial in subsets of patients with node-positive melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct; 14(10):2867-75.
Score: 0.075
-
Cost effectiveness of adjuvant interferon in node-positive melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 10; 25(17):2442-8.
Score: 0.074
-
Accuracy of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous wide local excision in patients with primary melanoma. Cancer. 2006 Dec 01; 107(11):2647-52.
Score: 0.072
-
Ethnic differences among patients with cutaneous melanoma. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Sep 25; 166(17):1907-14.
Score: 0.071
-
Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: defining a high-risk group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jul; 13(7):902-9.
Score: 0.069
-
Metastatic melanoma to lymph nodes in patients with unknown primary sites. Cancer. 2006 May 01; 106(9):2012-20.
Score: 0.069
-
Assessment of the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for primary cutaneous desmoplastic melanoma. Cancer. 2006 Feb 15; 106(4):900-6.
Score: 0.068
-
Population-based assessment of surgical treatment trends for patients with melanoma in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 01; 23(25):6054-62.
Score: 0.066
-
Predictors and natural history of in-transit melanoma after sentinel lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Aug; 12(8):587-96.
Score: 0.065
-
Functional annotation of melanoma risk loci identifies novel susceptibility genes. Carcinogenesis. 2020 06 17; 41(4):452-457.
Score: 0.046
-
Cumulative Incidence and Predictors of CNS Metastasis for Patients With American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Stage III Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020 05 01; 38(13):1429-1441.
Score: 0.045
-
Role of Immune Response, Inflammation, and Tumor Immune Response-Related Cytokines/Chemokines in Melanoma Progression. J Invest Dermatol. 2019 11; 139(11):2352-2358.e3.
Score: 0.043
-
Author Correction: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat Med. 2018 Dec; 24(12):1941.
Score: 0.041
-
Publisher Correction: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat Med. 2018 Dec; 24(12):1942.
Score: 0.041
-
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat Med. 2018 11; 24(11):1649-1654.
Score: 0.041
-
Prospective Analysis of Adoptive TIL Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: Response, Impact of Anti-CTLA4, and Biomarkers to Predict Clinical Outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 09 15; 24(18):4416-4428.
Score: 0.040
-
Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable melanoma: a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 02; 19(2):181-193.
Score: 0.039
-
Association between Body Mass Index, C-Reactive Protein Levels, and Melanoma Patient Outcomes. J Invest Dermatol. 2017 08; 137(8):1792-1795.
Score: 0.037
-
Association of Vitamin D Levels With Outcome in Patients With Melanoma After Adjustment For C-Reactive Protein. J Clin Oncol. 2016 05 20; 34(15):1741-7.
Score: 0.034
-
Association of Common Genetic Polymorphisms with Melanoma Patient IL-12p40 Blood Levels, Risk, and Outcomes. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Sep; 135(9):2266-2272.
Score: 0.032
-
C-reactive protein as a marker of melanoma progression. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 20; 33(12):1389-96.
Score: 0.032
-
The relationship between blood IL-12p40 level and melanoma progression. Int J Cancer. 2015 Apr 15; 136(8):1874-80.
Score: 0.031
-
Is surveillance imaging effective for detecting surgically treatable recurrences in patients with melanoma? A comparative analysis of stage-specific surveillance strategies. Ann Surg. 2014 Jun; 259(6):1215-22.
Score: 0.030
-
Specific lymphocyte subsets predict response to adoptive cell therapy using expanded autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in metastatic melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Dec 15; 18(24):6758-70.
Score: 0.027
-
Radiation therapy field extent for adjuvant treatment of axillary metastases from malignant melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Apr 01; 73(5):1376-82.
Score: 0.020
-
Phase II trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with metastatic melanoma. Br J Cancer. 2008 Sep 02; 99(5):734-40.
Score: 0.020
-
Melanoma adrenal metastasis: natural history and surgical management. Am J Surg. 2008 Mar; 195(3):363-8; discussion 368-9.
Score: 0.020
-
Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XPC, XPD, and XPG and risk of cutaneous melanoma: a case-control analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Dec; 15(12):2526-32.
Score: 0.018
-
Genetic variants of the vitamin D receptor gene alter risk of cutaneous melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2007 Feb; 127(2):276-80.
Score: 0.018
-
Utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging staging before completion lymphadenectomy in patients with sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 20; 24(18):2858-65.
Score: 0.017
-
Genetic variants of the ADPRT, XRCC1 and APE1 genes and risk of cutaneous melanoma. Carcinogenesis. 2006 Sep; 27(9):1894-901.
Score: 0.017
-
Polymorphisms of the FAS and FAS ligand genes associated with risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2006 Apr; 16(4):253-63.
Score: 0.017
-
In vitro sensitivity to ultraviolet B light and skin cancer risk: a case-control analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Dec 21; 97(24):1822-31.
Score: 0.017
-
Combined-modality therapy for patients with regional nodal metastases from melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 01; 64(1):106-13.
Score: 0.016