Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JORGE E CORTES and KOICHI TAKAHASHI.
JORGE E CORTES
Connection Strength
3.540
KOICHI TAKAHASHI
  1. A propensity score matching analysis of dasatinib and nilotinib as a frontline therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Cancer. 2016 Nov 15; 122(21):3336-3343.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.569
  2. Salvage therapy using FLT3 inhibitors may improve long-term outcome of relapsed or refractory AML in patients with FLT3-ITD. Br J Haematol. 2013 Jun; 161(5):659-666.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.451
  3. Geographic Disparity of Outcome in Patients With Cancer Over Decades: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 11; 23(11):e369-e378.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  4. The LEukemia Artificial Intelligence Program (LEAP) in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: A model to improve patient outcomes. Am J Hematol. 2021 02 01; 96(2):241-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  5. Phase II trial of CPX-351 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at high risk for induction mortality. Leukemia. 2020 11; 34(11):2914-2924.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  6. Incidence of second malignancies in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Int J Hematol. 2019 May; 109(5):545-552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  7. Integrative genomic analysis of adult mixed phenotype acute leukemia delineates lineage associated molecular subtypes. Nat Commun. 2018 07 10; 9(1):2670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  8. Clearance of Somatic Mutations at Remission and the Risk of Relapse in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2018 06 20; 36(18):1788-1797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  9. Prediction for sustained deep molecular response of BCR-ABL1 levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Cancer. 2018 03 15; 124(6):1160-1168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  10. Frontline therapy with high-dose imatinib versus second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia - a propensity score analysis. Haematologica. 2016 08; 101(8):e324-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  11. Conditional survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer. 2016 Jan 15; 122(2):238-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  12. JAK2 p.V617F detection and allele burden measurement in peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirates in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2013 Nov 28; 122(23):3784-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  13. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2013 Oct 17; 122(16):2807-11; quiz 2920.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  14. Dynamic acquisition of FLT3 or RAS alterations drive a subset of patients with lower risk MDS to secondary AML. Leukemia. 2013 Oct; 27(10):2081-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  15. Chromosome 5q deletion is extremely rare in patients with myelofibrosis. Leuk Res. 2013 May; 37(5):552-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  16. Outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blastic phase and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with hyper-CVAD and dasatinib. Cancer. 2021 08 01; 127(15):2641-2647.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  17. Outcomes of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia after frontline hypomethylating agent and venetoclax regimens. Haematologica. 2021 03 01; 106(3):894-898.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  18. Correction to: Outcomes with sequential FLT3-inhibitor-based therapies in patients with AML. J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Feb 23; 14(1):34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  19. Patterns of Resistance Differ in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Type I versus Type II FLT3 inhibitors. Blood Cancer Discov. 2021 03; 2(2):125-134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  20. Outcomes with sequential FLT3-inhibitor-based therapies in patients with AML. J Hematol Oncol. 2020 10 08; 13(1):132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  21. Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia related changes depend on diagnostic criteria and therapy. Am J Hematol. 2020 06; 95(6):612-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  22. Idarubicin, cytarabine, and nivolumab in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Sep; 6(9):e480-e488.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  23. Phase II Trial of MEK Inhibitor Binimetinib (MEK162) in RAS-mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 03; 19(3):142-148.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  24. A phase 2 study of ruxolitinib in combination with azacitidine in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018 10 18; 132(16):1664-1674.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  25. MYC protein expression is an important prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 01; 60(1):37-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  26. Treated secondary acute myeloid leukemia: a distinct high-risk subset of AML with adverse prognosis. Blood Adv. 2017 Jul 25; 1(17):1312-1323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  27. Characteristics and outcomes of older patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia according to treatment approach. Cancer. 2017 Aug 15; 123(16):3050-3060.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.