Connection

SARAH SCOLLON to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications SARAH SCOLLON has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.234
  1. Satisfaction with mode of delivery of genomic sequencing results in a diverse national sample of research participants through the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium. Genet Med. 2024 Sep; 26(9):101176.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  2. Families' experiences accessing care after genomic sequencing in the pediatric cancer context: "It's just been a big juggle". J Genet Couns. 2024 Dec; 33(6):1337-1350.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  3. Clinical and molecular features of pediatric cancer patients with Lynch syndrome. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 11; 69(11):e29859.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  4. Scaling Genetic Counseling in the Genomics Era. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2021 08 31; 22:339-355.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  5. Exome sequencing disclosures in pediatric cancer care: Patterns of communication among oncologists, genetic counselors, and parents. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 04; 102(4):680-686.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  6. Clinical providers' experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study. BMC Med Genomics. 2018 05 08; 11(1):45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  7. A Comprehensive Review of Pediatric Tumors and Associated Cancer Predisposition Syndromes. J Genet Couns. 2017 Jun; 26(3):387-434.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  8. Pediatric Cancer Genetics Research and an Evolving Preventive Ethics Approach for Return of Results after Death of the Subject. J Law Med Ethics. 2015; 43(3):529-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  9. Haploinsufficiency of STK11 and neighboring genes cause a contiguous gene syndrome including Peutz-Jeghers phenotype. Am J Med Genet A. 2012 Nov; 158A(11):2959-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  10. A family-based approach to cascade genetic testing in a pediatric cancer genetics clinic. Fam Cancer. 2024 Nov 20; 24(1):8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  11. Update on Pediatric Cancer Surveillance Recommendations for Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1, Noonan Syndrome, CBL Syndrome, Costello Syndrome, and Related RASopathies. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Nov 01; 30(21):4834-4843.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  12. Update on Recommendations for Surveillance for Children with Predisposition to Hematopoietic Malignancy. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 01; 30(19):4286-4295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  13. Update on Genetic Counselor Practice and Recommendations for Pediatric Cancer Predisposition Evaluation and Surveillance. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 13; 30(18):3983-3989.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  14. Comparing the Diagnostic Yield of Germline Exome Versus Panel Sequencing in the Diverse Population of the Texas KidsCanSeq Pediatric Cancer Study. JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Sep; 8:e2400187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  15. Neuroblastoma Predisposition and Surveillance-An Update from the 2023 AACR Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Aug 01; 30(15):3137-3143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  16. Update on Cancer Predisposition Syndromes and Surveillance Guidelines for Childhood Brain Tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Jun 03; 30(11):2342-2350.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  17. Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents. Genet Med. 2024 Aug; 26(8):101168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  18. Information-seeking preferences in diverse patients receiving a genetic testing result in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) study. Genet Med. 2023 09; 25(9):100899.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  19. Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2023 10; 12(5):773-781.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  20. Return of non-ACMG recommended incidental genetic findings to pediatric patients: considerations and opportunities from experiences in genomic sequencing. Genome Med. 2022 11 21; 14(1):131.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  21. FOCAD Indel in a Family With Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 07 01; 75(1):56-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  22. Evolution of germline TP53 variant classification in children with cancer. Cancer Genet. 2022 06; 264-265:29-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  23. Distinct somatic DICER1 hotspot mutations in three metachronous ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors in a patient with DICER1 syndrome. Cancer Genet. 2022 04; 262-263:53-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  24. Genomic analysis and preclinical xenograft model development identify potential therapeutic targets for MYOD1-mutant soft-tissue sarcoma of childhood. J Pathol. 2021 09; 255(1):52-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  25. A review and definition of 'usual care' in genetic counseling trials to standardize use in research. J Genet Couns. 2021 02; 30(1):42-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  26. Phenotypic Differences in Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome With or Without a Disease-causing SMAD4/BMPR1A Variant. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 02; 14(2):215-222.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  27. Germline POLE mutation in a child with hypermutated medulloblastoma and features of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2019 10; 5(5).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  28. Consent for clinical genome sequencing: considerations from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Per Med. 2019 07; 16(4):325-333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  29. Agents of empathy: How medical interpreters bridge sociocultural gaps in genomic sequencing disclosures with Spanish-speaking families. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 05; 102(5):895-901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  30. The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2018 09 06; 103(3):319-327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  31. Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium. J Genet Couns. 2018 09; 27(5):1220-1227.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  32. Portero versus portador: Spanish interpretation of genomic terminology during whole exome sequencing results disclosure. Per Med. 2017 11; 14(6):503-514.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  33. Haploinsufficiency of the Chromatin Remodeler BPTF Causes Syndromic Developmental and Speech Delay, Postnatal Microcephaly, and Dysmorphic Features. Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Oct 05; 101(4):503-515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  34. Genetic Counselor Recommendations for Cancer Predisposition Evaluation and Surveillance in the Pediatric Oncology Patient. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 07 01; 23(13):e91-e97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  35. Retinoblastoma and Neuroblastoma Predisposition and Surveillance. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 07 01; 23(13):e98-e106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  36. Cancer Screening Recommendations and Clinical Management of Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer Syndromes in Childhood. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 07 01; 23(13):e107-e114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  37. Recommendations for Surveillance for Children with Leukemia-Predisposing Conditions. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 01; 23(11):e14-e22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  38. Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing. Am J Med Genet A. 2015 Nov; 167A(11):2635-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  39. "Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing. J Genet Couns. 2016 Feb; 25(1):62-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  40. Parent decision-making around the genetic testing of children for germline TP53 mutations. Cancer. 2015 Jan 15; 121(2):286-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.