TREVOR BIBLER to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications TREVOR BIBLER has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
0.381
-
Against the Phrase "Aggressive Care". Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2025 Jul; 34(3):513-515.
Score: 0.025
-
A Risk Is Not a Harm: Abortion Exceptions in State Laws. Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Jul; 54(4):47.
Score: 0.024
-
Withdrawing extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) against a family's wishes: Three permissible scenarios. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 07; 42(7):849-852.
Score: 0.022
-
Building Effective Mentoring Relationships During Clinical Ethics Fellowships: Pedagogy, Programs, and People. HEC Forum. 2024 Mar; 36(1):1-29.
Score: 0.020
-
Responding Well to Spiritual Worldviews: A Taxonomy for Clinical Ethicists. HEC Forum. 2023 Dec; 35(4):309-323.
Score: 0.020
-
Determination of Brain Death. JAMA. 2021 02 02; 325(5):493-494.
Score: 0.019
-
Between Crisis and Convention: How Should We Address Contingency? Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 09; 50(5):17-19.
Score: 0.018
-
Ethical Challenges in Advance Care Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Bioeth. 2020 07; 20(7):202-204.
Score: 0.018
-
A Process-Based Approach to Responding to Parents or Guardians Who Hope for a Miracle. Pediatrics. 2020 03; 145(3).
Score: 0.017
-
"Do we have to replace the balloon pump when it fails?" Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Jan; 50(1):10-13.
Score: 0.017
-
Remaining ambiguities surrounding theological negotiation and spiritual care: reply to Greenblum and Hubbard. J Med Ethics. 2019 11; 45(11):711-712.
Score: 0.017
-
Choosing between Practicing Good Medicine and Following the Law in Texas. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 08 15; 200(4):513-514.
Score: 0.017
-
"What if she was your mother?" Toward better responses. J Crit Care. 2019 02; 49:155-157.
Score: 0.016
-
Responding to Those Who Hope for a Miracle: Practices for Clinical Bioethicists. Am J Bioeth. 2018 May; 18(5):40-51.
Score: 0.015
-
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Responding to Those Who Hope for a Miracle: Practices for Clinical Bioethicists". Am J Bioeth. 2018 05; 18(5):W1-W5.
Score: 0.015
-
Addressing a Patient's Hope for a Miracle. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 02; 55(2):535-539.
Score: 0.015
-
"I am not interested in talking with you.". Hastings Cent Rep. 2016 07; 46(4):7-9.
Score: 0.014
-
Not There Yet: Evaluating Clinical Ethics Consultation in an Accountability Culture. Am J Bioeth. 2016; 16(3):46-8.
Score: 0.013
-
Case study. Consultations across Languages. Commentary. Hastings Cent Rep. 2015 May-Jun; 45(3):13-4.
Score: 0.012
-
A risky recommendation. Am J Bioeth. 2015; 15(1):70-2.
Score: 0.012
-
Why I no longer say "withdrawal of care" or "life sustaining technology". J Palliat Med. 2013 Sep; 16(9):1146-7.
Score: 0.011
-
From Bridge to Destination? Ethical Considerations Related to Withdrawal of ECMO Support over the Objections of Capacitated Patients. Am J Bioeth. 2023 06; 23(6):5-17.
Score: 0.005
-
Critical Conversations: Say This, Not That. Chest. 2020 09; 158(3):896-898.
Score: 0.004
-
We don't need unilateral DNRs: taking informed non-dissent one step further. J Med Ethics. 2019 05; 45(5):314-317.
Score: 0.004
-
Legislating Medicine: The Need for Evidence, Argument, and Alliance. Crit Care Med. 2018 05; 46(5):788-790.
Score: 0.004
-
A Qualitative Exploration of a Clinical Ethicist's Role and Contributions During Family Meetings. HEC Forum. 2016 Dec; 28(4):283-299.
Score: 0.003
-
Navigating Ethical Conflicts Between Advance Directives and Surrogate Decision-Makers' Interpretations of Patient Wishes. Chest. 2016 Feb; 149(2):562-567.
Score: 0.003