Connection

Sruthi Srinivasan to Male

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Sruthi Srinivasan has written about Male.
Connection Strength

0.167
  1. Customary practices in the monitoring of dry eye disease in Sjogren's syndrome. J Optom. 2018 Oct - Dec; 11(4):232-241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  2. iTRAQ quantitative proteomics in the analysis of tears in dry eye patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 31; 53(8):5052-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  3. Infrared imaging of meibomian gland structure using a novel keratograph. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 May; 89(5):788-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  4. Apparent time-dependent differences in inferior tear meniscus height in human subjects with mild dry eye symptoms. Clin Exp Optom. 2007 Sep; 90(5):345-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  5. Morphological characteristics of Meibomian Glands and their Influence on Dry Eye disease in contact lens wearers. Ocul Surf. 2022 04; 24:93-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  6. Optimization of goblet cell density quantification methods. Exp Eye Res. 2021 06; 207:108607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  7. Bulbar Redness and Dry Eye Disease: Comparison of a Validated Subjective Grading Scale and an Objective Automated Method. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 02 01; 98(2):113-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  8. Dry Eye Disease in University-based Clinics in Canada: A Retrospective Chart Review. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 11; 97(11):944-953.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  9. Impact of meibomian gland width on successful contact lens use. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 12; 42(6):646-651.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  10. Prevalence of dry eye disease in Ontario, Canada: A population-based survey. Ocul Surf. 2019 07; 17(3):526-531.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  11. Clinical factors associated with contact lens dropout. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 06; 42(3):318-324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  12. Comparison of meibomian gland dropout using two infrared imaging devices. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 06; 42(3):311-317.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  13. An Eyelid Warming Device for the Management of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. J Optom. 2019 Apr - Jun; 12(2):120-130.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  14. Sjogren's syndrome in optometric practices in North America. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 12; 41(6):518-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  15. Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy in Soft Contact Lens Wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 08; 93(8):943-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  16. The relief of dry eye signs and symptoms using a combination of lubricants, lid hygiene and ocular nutraceuticals. J Optom. 2017 Jan - Mar; 10(1):26-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  17. Self versus examiner administration of the Ocular Surface Disease Index?. J Optom. 2017 Jan - Mar; 10(1):34-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  18. Associations with Meibomian Gland Atrophy in Daily Contact Lens Wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Sep; 92(9):e206-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  19. Variations in observable lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) staining patterns in wearers of silicone hydrogel lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015 Dec; 38(6):471-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  20. Atomic force microscopy and Langmuir-Blodgett monolayer technique to assess contact lens deposits and human meibum extracts. J Optom. 2015 Jul-Sep; 8(3):187-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  21. Infrared imaging of meibomian glands and evaluation of the lipid layer in Sj?gren's syndrome patients and nondry eye controls. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jan 08; 56(2):836-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  22. Repeatability of grading meibomian gland dropout using two infrared systems. Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Jun; 91(6):658-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  23. Quantification of non-polar lipid deposits on senofilcon a contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Oct; 88(10):1172-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.