Header Logo

Connection

DAVID ALLISON to Feeding Behavior

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID ALLISON has written about Feeding Behavior.
DAVID ALLISON
Connection Strength
3.977
Feeding Behavior
  1. Ignoring Clustering and Nesting Effects Are Invalid Analysis Choices in a Trial with Clustered Data in Trials Testing Causal Effects. Re: "Impact of a Montessori-Based Nutrition Program on Children's Knowledge and Eating Behaviors". J Sch Health. 2023 10; 93(10):964.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.561
  2. Reanalysis Accounting for Clustering and Nesting Overturns Conclusions in: "Watching TV Cooking Programs: Effects on Actual Food Intake Among Children". J Nutr Educ Behav. 2023 02; 55(2):161-163.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.557
  3. Experimentally Manipulated Low Social Status and Food Insecurity Alter Eating Behavior Among Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020 11; 28(11):2010-2019.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.477
  4. The effects of experimentally manipulated social status on acute eating behavior: A randomized, crossover pilot study. Physiol Behav. 2016 Aug 01; 162:93-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  5. Second-hand eating? Maternal perception of the food environment affects reproductive investment in mice. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 May; 23(5):927-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.324
  6. Order of magnitude misestimation of weight effects of children's meal policy proposals. Child Obes. 2014 Dec; 10(6):542-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.316
  7. The effectiveness of breakfast recommendations on weight loss: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Aug; 100(2):507-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.306
  8. A twin study of self-regulatory eating in early childhood: estimates of genetic and environmental influence, and measurement considerations. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Jul; 36(7):931-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.259
  9. Project Grow-2-Gether: a study of the genetic and environmental influences on child eating and obesity. Twin Res. 2002 Oct; 5(5):472-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  10. Subjective social status is associated with compensation for large meals - A prospective pilot study. Appetite. 2019 01 01; 132:249-256.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  11. Putting the behavior into the behavior genetics of obesity. Behav Genet. 1997 Jul; 27(4):423-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  12. Observational research rigour alone does not justify causal inference. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016 Dec; 46(12):985-993.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  13. Portion sizes for children are predicted by parental characteristics and the amounts parents serve themselves. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Apr; 99(4):763-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  14. Belief beyond the evidence: using the proposed effect of breakfast on obesity to show 2 practices that distort scientific evidence. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Nov; 98(5):1298-308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  15. Evidence of commingling in human eating behavior. Obes Res. 1993 Sep; 1(5):339-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  16. Conjectures on some curious connections among social status, calorie restriction, hunger, fatness, and longevity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Aug; 1264:1-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  17. Evidence, discourse and values in obesity-oriented policy: menu labeling as a conversation starter. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Apr; 35(4):464-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  18. Fruit and vegetable pricing by demographic factors in the Birmingham, Alabama, metropolitan area, 2004-2005. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jul; 7(4):A78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.