Header Logo

Connection

AMY MCGUIRE to United States

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications AMY MCGUIRE has written about United States.
AMY MCGUIRE
Connection Strength
1.508
United States
  1. FIGG at 5: An update on U.S. public perspectives on forensic investigative genetic genealogy five years after its introduction to criminal investigations. Forensic Sci Int. 2025 Feb; 367:112372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  2. Investigative genetic genealogy practices warranting policy attention: Results of a modified policy Delphi. PLoS Genet. 2025 Jan; 21(1):e1011520.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  3. Supportive Touch in Psychedelic Assisted Therapy. Am J Bioeth. 2025 Jan; 25(1):29-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  4. IGG in the trenches: Results of an in-depth interview study on the practice, politics, and future of investigative genetic genealogy. Forensic Sci Int. 2024 Mar; 356:111946.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  5. Airmen and health-care providers' attitudes toward the use of genomic sequencing in the US Air Force: findings from the MilSeq Project. Genet Med. 2020 12; 22(12):2003-2010.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  6. Ethical Challenges Arising in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Overview from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD) Task Force. Am J Bioeth. 2020 07; 20(7):15-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  7. Physician Involvement in Promoting Gun Safety. Ann Fam Med. 2020 05; 18(3):262-264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  8. A Right to Privacy and Confidentiality: Ethical Medical Care for Patients in United States Immigration Detention. J Law Med Ethics. 2020 03; 48(1):161-168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  9. Who's on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services. Genet Med. 2020 01; 22(1):4-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  10. Clarify the HIPAA right of access to individuals' research data. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 08; 37(8):850-852.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  11. Who Owns the Data in a Medical Information Commons? J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):62-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  12. Sharing data under the 21st Century Cures Act. Genet Med. 2017 12; 19(12):1289-1294.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  13. GINA, genetic discrimination, and genomic medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29; 372(5):397-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  14. Can I be sued for that? Liability risk and the disclosure of clinically significant genetic research findings. Genome Res. 2014 May; 24(5):719-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  15. Athletes' use of unproven stem cell therapies: adding to inappropriate media hype? Mol Ther. 2012 Sep; 20(9):1656-1658.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  16. Currents in contemporary bioethics. Identifying consanguinity through routine genomic analysis: reporting requirements. J Law Med Ethics. 2012; 40(4):1040-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  17. Ethical and practical challenges of sharing data from genome-wide association studies: the eMERGE Consortium experience. Genome Res. 2011 Jul; 21(7):1001-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  18. Science and regulation. Regulating direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Science. 2010 Oct 08; 330(6001):181-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  19. Informed consent in genomics and genetic research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010; 11:361-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  20. Currents in contemporary ethics. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: is it the practice of medicine? J Law Med Ethics. 2009; 37(2):369-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  21. Please don't call my mom: pediatric consent and confidentiality. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009 Apr; 48(3):243-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  22. An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons. JAMA. 2008 Dec 10; 300(22):2669-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  23. Ethical, legal, and social considerations in conducting the Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res. 2008 Dec; 18(12):1861-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  24. Identifiability of DNA data: the need for consistent federal policy. Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct; 8(10):75-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  25. Confidentiality, privacy, and security of genetic and genomic test information in electronic health records: points to consider. Genet Med. 2008 Jul; 10(7):495-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  26. Genetics. No longer de-identified. Science. 2006 Apr 21; 312(5772):370-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  27. Meeting the growing demands of genetic research. J Law Med Ethics. 2006; 34(4):809-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  28. Forensic investigative genetic genealogy and public trust. J Forensic Sci. 2025 Nov; 70(6):2113-2116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  29. "Holy Cow, Where do I Sign up?" Attitudes of Military Veterans Toward Epigenomic Biomarker Toxic Exposure Testing. Mil Med. 2025 Jun 30; 190(7-8):e1663-e1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  30. Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making. Med Care. 2005 May; 43(5):466-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  31. "A Double-Edged Sword": A Brief History of Genomic Data Governance and Genetic Researcher Perspectives on Data Sharing. J Law Med Ethics. 2024; 52(2):399-411.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  32. Public Perspectives on Investigative Genetic Genealogy: Findings from a National Focus Group Study. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Oct-Dec; 15(4):280-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  33. Genetic testing in ambulatory cardiology clinics reveals high rate of findings with clinical management implications. Genet Med. 2021 12; 23(12):2404-2414.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  34. Ventilator Triage Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic at U.S. Hospitals Associated With Members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Ann Intern Med. 2020 08 04; 173(3):188-194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  35. Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics. J Law Med Ethics. 2020 03; 48(1):69-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  36. In support of mitochondrial replacement therapy. Nat Med. 2019 06; 25(6):870-871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  37. What is a Medical Information Commons? J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):41-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  38. How the tobacco industry continues to keep the home fires burning. Tob Control. 1999; 8(1):67-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  39. Genetic Basis for Congenital Heart Disease: Revisited: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018 11 20; 138(21):e653-e711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  40. The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2018 09 06; 103(3):319-327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  41. Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium. Genet Med. 2018 04; 20(5):545-553.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  42. Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience. Milbank Q. 2017 06; 95(2):291-318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  43. Myriad take two: Can genomic databases remain secret? Science. 2017 05 12; 356(6338):586-587.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  44. Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health. Pediatrics. 2017 Feb; 139(2).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  45. Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 06 02; 98(6):1051-1066.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  46. Developing context-specific next-generation sequencing policy. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 05 06; 34(5):466-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  47. Legal Barriers to Adolescent Participation in Research About HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections. Am J Public Health. 2016 Jan; 106(1):40-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  48. Do recent US Supreme Court rulings on patenting of genes and genetic diagnostics affect the practice of genetic screening and diagnosis in prenatal and reproductive care? Prenat Diagn. 2014 Oct; 34(10):921-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  49. Social and behavioral research in genomic sequencing: approaches from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium Outcomes and Measures Working Group. Genet Med. 2014 Oct; 16(10):727-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  50. Reflections on the cost of "low-cost" whole genome sequencing: framing the health policy debate. PLoS Biol. 2013 Nov; 11(11):e1001699.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  51. Experiences and attitudes of genome investigators regarding return of individual genetic test results. Genet Med. 2013 Nov; 15(11):882-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  52. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science. 2013 Jan 18; 339(6117):321-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  53. Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility. Genome Res. 2012 Mar; 22(3):421-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  54. Informed consent in research to improve the number and quality of deceased donor organs. Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb; 39(2):280-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  55. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Dec; 3(6):574-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  56. Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium. Genet Med. 2010 Oct; 12(10):616-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  57. Developing a tissue resource to characterize the genome of pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 2009 Apr; 33(4):723-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  58. Principal investigator views of the IRB system. Int J Med Sci. 2008 Apr 02; 5(2):68-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  59. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 06; 140(1):54-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.