LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH to United States
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH has written about United States.
Connection Strength
2.304
-
Robert Veatch's Disrupted Dialogue and its implications for bioethics. Theor Med Bioeth. 2022 08; 43(4):221-233.
Score: 0.068
-
Undue burdens created by the Texas Abortion Law for vulnerable pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 04; 226(4):529-534.
Score: 0.066
-
Neonatal outcomes of births in freestanding birth centers and hospitals in the United States, 2016-2019. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 01; 226(1):116.e1-116.e7.
Score: 0.063
-
Inclusion of pregnant individuals among priority populations for coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination for all 50 states in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 05; 224(5):536-539.
Score: 0.062
-
In Response to COVID-19 Pandemic Physicians Already Know What to Do. Am J Bioeth. 2020 07; 20(7):9-12.
Score: 0.058
-
Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the?type of birth attendant. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 08; 223(2):254.e1-254.e8.
Score: 0.058
-
Race differences in cardiovascular disease and breast cancer mortality among US women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 2019 12 01; 48(6):1897-1905.
Score: 0.057
-
Perinatal critical care and ethics in perinatal medicine: the role of the perinatologist. J Perinat Med. 2017 Dec 20; 45(9):991-997.
Score: 0.050
-
Respect for professors: an often underappreciated component of professionalism in medical education. J Perinat Med. 2017 Dec 20; 45(9):1079-1080.
Score: 0.050
-
Underlying causes of neonatal deaths in term singleton pregnancies: home births versus hospital births in the United States. J Perinat Med. 2017 Apr 01; 45(3):349-357.
Score: 0.047
-
Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 04; 216(4):401.e1-401.e8.
Score: 0.047
-
Three decades after Baby Doe: how neonatologists and bioethicists conceptualize the Best Interests Standard. J Perinatol. 2016 10; 36(10):906-11.
Score: 0.045
-
Neonatal Mortality of Planned Home Birth in the United States in Relation to Professional Certification of Birth Attendants. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0155721.
Score: 0.044
-
Ethics and professional responsibility: Essential dimensions of planned home birth. Semin Perinatol. 2016 06; 40(4):222-6.
Score: 0.043
-
Justified skepticism about Apgar scoring in out-of-hospital birth settings. J Perinat Med. 2015 Jul; 43(4):455-60.
Score: 0.042
-
Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar; 212(3):350.e1-6.
Score: 0.040
-
Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006-2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct; 211(4):390.e1-7.
Score: 0.038
-
Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct; 209(4):323.e1-6.
Score: 0.036
-
The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64.
Score: 0.035
-
Ethics of medical finance: when is enough too much? J Vasc Surg. 2012 Oct; 56(4):1153-4.
Score: 0.035
-
Medical care manifesto. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun; 55(6):1812-3.
Score: 0.034
-
Directive counseling about becoming pregnant. Virtual Mentor. 2012 Feb 01; 14(2):94-8.
Score: 0.033
-
An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients. Am J Bioeth. 2011 May; 11(5):39-49.
Score: 0.031
-
A case study in unethical transgressive bioethics: "Letter of concern from bioethicists" about the prenatal administration of dexamethasone. Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep; 10(9):35-45.
Score: 0.030
-
A new approach to professional liability reform: placing obligations of stakeholders ahead of their interests. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep; 203(3):203.e1-7.
Score: 0.029
-
Taking seriously the "what then?" question: an ethical framework for the responsible management of medical disasters. J Clin Ethics. 2010; 21(4):321-7.
Score: 0.029
-
Women and children first: transforming a historic defining moment into a contemporary ethical imperative. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct; 201(4):351.e1-5.
Score: 0.028
-
Where to declare poor nursing home care. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Oct; 50(4):934-5.
Score: 0.028
-
Surgical infomercials: the ethical price of stardom. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul; 50(1):214-5.
Score: 0.028
-
Conceptual challenges and practical approaches to screening capacity for self-care and protection in vulnerable older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Nov; 56 Suppl 2:S266-70.
Score: 0.026
-
Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Mar; 23(3):267-74.
Score: 0.025
-
Professional responsibility and individual conscience: protecting the informed consent process from impermissible bias. J Clin Ethics. 2008; 19(1):24-5.
Score: 0.025
-
Medical tort falls short in court. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec; 46(6):1303-5.
Score: 0.025
-
What to do when a patient's international medical care goes south. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Nov; 46(5):1077-9.
Score: 0.025
-
Intentional over-treatment: the unmentionable conflict-of-interest. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Sep; 46(3):605-7.
Score: 0.024
-
Fiduciary economization: your wealth or your health. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Apr; 45(4):858-60.
Score: 0.024
-
Corporate funding of professional foundations: Just another black sheep? J Vasc Surg. 2006 Nov; 44(5):1126-8.
Score: 0.023
-
Quality credentialing: boon or boondoggle? J Vasc Surg. 2006 May; 43(5):1073-5.
Score: 0.022
-
Neonatal ethics at the limits of viability. Pediatrics. 2005 Oct; 116(4):1019-21.
Score: 0.021
-
A comprehensive ethical framework for responsibly designing and conducting pharmacologic research that involves pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):901-7.
Score: 0.021
-
Responsibly managing the medical school--teaching hospital power relationship. Acad Med. 2005 Jul; 80(7):690-3.
Score: 0.021
-
Implementation of first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21: ethical considerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun; 192(6):1777-81.
Score: 0.021
-
The diagnosis and management of progressive dysfunction of health care organizations. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr; 105(4):882-7.
Score: 0.021
-
An ethical critique of boutique fetal imaging:a case for the medicalization of fetal imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan; 192(1):31-3.
Score: 0.020
-
Beyond Tuskegee: A contemporary qualitative assessment of barriers to research participation among Black women. Cancer. 2025 Jan 01; 131(1):e35648.
Score: 0.020
-
A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 06; 140(1):54-9.
Score: 0.019
-
Ethics of research and the pregnant patient. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Dec; 3(6):505-9.
Score: 0.019
-
A surgeon's obligations when performing new procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Feb; 35(2):409-10.
Score: 0.017
-
Trust, moral responsibility, the self, and well-ordered societies: the importance of basic philosophical concepts for clinical ethics. J Med Philos. 2002 Feb; 27(1):3-9.
Score: 0.017
-
Bioethical pluralism and complementarity. Perspect Biol Med. 2002; 45(3):338-49.
Score: 0.016
-
The accidental bioethicist. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2002; 11(4):359-68.
Score: 0.016
-
Power, integrity, and trust in the managed practice of medicine: lessons from the history of medical ethics. Soc Philos Policy. 2002; 19(2):180-211.
Score: 0.016
-
Finely crafted distinctions and the art of clinical ethics. J Med Philos. 2001 Feb; 26(1):5-11.
Score: 0.015
-
Implications of impaired executive control functions for patient autonomy and surrogate decision making. J Clin Ethics. 2001; 12(4):397-405.
Score: 0.015
-
Influence of religious and spiritual values on the willingness of Chinese-Americans to donate organs for transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2000 Oct; 14(5):449-56.
Score: 0.015
-
How men view genetic testing for prostate cancer risk: findings from focus groups. Clin Genet. 2000 Sep; 58(3):169-76.
Score: 0.015
-
Fetal interventions in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: statement from the North American Fetal Therapy Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 08; 223(2):281-284.
Score: 0.015
-
Laying medicine open: innovative interaction between medicine and the humanities. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Mar; 9(1):1-5.
Score: 0.013
-
Laying medicine open: understanding major turning points in the history of medical ethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Mar; 9(1):7-23.
Score: 0.013
-
Moral authority, power, and trust in clinical ethics. J Med Philos. 1999 Feb; 24(1):3-10.
Score: 0.013
-
A basic concept in the clinical ethics of managed care: physicians and institutions as economically disciplined moral co-fiduciaries of populations of patients. J Med Philos. 1999 Feb; 24(1):77-97.
Score: 0.013
-
An Ethical Framework for Research in Maternal-Fetal Intervention in the Presence of Maternal Human Immunodeficiency Virus or Hepatitis B and C Infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 01; 133(1):48-52.
Score: 0.013
-
Preventing incremental drift away from professionalism in graduate medical education. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 12; 219(6):589.e1-589.e3.
Score: 0.013
-
Guild interests: an insidious threat to professionalism in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 12; 219(6):581-584.
Score: 0.013
-
Placentophagy among women planning community births in the United States: Frequency, rationale, and associated neonatal outcomes. Birth. 2019 03; 46(1):201-202.
Score: 0.013
-
Ethical dimensions of ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18; 847:185-90.
Score: 0.013
-
Preventive ethics, managed practice, and the hospital ethics committee as a resource for physician executives. HEC Forum. 1998 Jun; 10(2):136-51.
Score: 0.013
-
A survey of honor-related practices among US obstetricians and gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Nov; 139(2):164-169.
Score: 0.012
-
Effect of advanced maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep; 216:178-183.
Score: 0.012
-
The limits of viability. J Perinat Med. 1997; 25(5):418-20.
Score: 0.012
-
Bioethics in the twenty-first century: why we should pay attention to eighteenth-century medical ethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Dec; 6(4):329-33.
Score: 0.012
-
A preventive ethics approach to counseling patients about clinical futility in the primary care setting. Arch Fam Med. 1996 Nov-Dec; 5(10):589-92.
Score: 0.011
-
Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 06 02; 98(6):1051-1066.
Score: 0.011
-
Why VHA should keep the door to physician-assisted suicide closed. NCCE News. 1996; 4(3):1-2, 9-11.
Score: 0.011
-
Fetal tissue research: an ongoing story of professionally responsible success. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec; 213(6):819.e1-4.
Score: 0.011
-
The essential role of medical ethics education in achieving professionalism: the Romanell Report. Acad Med. 2015 Jun; 90(6):744-52.
Score: 0.010
-
Health care justice and its implications for current policy of a mandatory waiting period for elective tubal sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun; 212(6):736-9.
Score: 0.010
-
The threat of the new managed practice of medicine to patients' autonomy. J Clin Ethics. 1995; 6(4):320-3.
Score: 0.010
-
Should we create a health care system in the United States? J Med Philos. 1994 Oct; 19(5):483-90.
Score: 0.010
-
The OHRP and SUPPORT. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20; 368(25):e36.
Score: 0.009
-
Planned home birth in the United States and professionalism: a critical assessment. J Clin Ethics. 2013; 24(3):184-91.
Score: 0.009
-
Planned home birth: the professional responsibility response. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan; 208(1):31-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Perspective: Medical education in medical ethics and humanities as the foundation for developing medical professionalism. Acad Med. 2012 Mar; 87(3):334-41.
Score: 0.008
-
Bioethics education: diversity and critique. J Med Philos. 1991 Feb; 16(1):1-4.
Score: 0.008
-
Respect for the autonomy of the pregnant woman in surrogacy agreements: an elaboration of a fundamental ethical concern. Womens Health Issues. 1991; 1(3):143-4.
Score: 0.008
-
Ethics: an essential dimension of soliciting philanthropic gifts from donors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec; 203(6):540.e1-4.
Score: 0.008
-
Re-visioning Flexner: educating physicians to be clinical scientists and humanists. Am J Med. 2010 Dec; 123(12):1155-6.
Score: 0.008
-
NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Mar 10; 27(3):1-42.
Score: 0.007
-
Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies. Lancet. 1990 Jan 13; 335(8681):90-3.
Score: 0.007
-
Women and children first-or last? The New York Declaration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct; 201(4):335.
Score: 0.007
-
An ethical justification and policy for making commitments during computerized residency application processes: The US matching program as a laboratory for needed reform. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 Aug; 16(3):427-33.
Score: 0.007
-
A national survey concerning the ethical aspects of informed consent and role of medical students. J Med Educ. 1988 Nov; 63(11):821-9.
Score: 0.007
-
Racial and ethnic differences in the treatment of seriously ill patients: a comparison of African-American, Caucasian and Hispanic veterans. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Sep; 100(9):1041-51.
Score: 0.007
-
Informed consent policies governing medical students' interactions with patients. J Med Educ. 1987 Oct; 62(10):789-98.
Score: 0.006
-
Ethical and legal implications of genetic testing in androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Pediatr. 2007 Apr; 150(4):434-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Finding family for prospective consent in emergency research. Clin Trials. 2007; 4(6):631-7.
Score: 0.006
-
When patients request specific interventions: Defining the limits of the physician's obligation. N Engl J Med. 1986 Nov 20; 315(21):1347-51.
Score: 0.006
-
Ethics and professionalism: do we need yet another surgeons' charter? J Vasc Surg. 2006 Oct; 44(4):903-6.
Score: 0.006
-
My brother's keeper: uncompensated care for illegal immigrants. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Sep; 44(3):679-82.
Score: 0.006
-
From premiums to payouts: who's behind the malpractice crisis, anyway? J Vasc Surg. 2006 Mar; 43(3):635-8.
Score: 0.005
-
Methodological concerns in bioethics. J Med Philos. 1986 Feb; 11(1):17-37.
Score: 0.005
-
Principles and practice of geriatric assent. Aging Ment Health. 2006 Jan; 10(1):48-54.
Score: 0.005
-
Moral dilemmas and economic realities. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1985 Sep-Oct; 30(5):63-75.
Score: 0.005
-
Turf wars: the ethics of professional territorialism. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Sep; 42(3):587-9.
Score: 0.005
-
Show me the money: the ethics of physicians' income. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Aug; 42(2):377-9.
Score: 0.005
-
Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making. Med Care. 2005 May; 43(5):466-70.
Score: 0.005
-
Who should protect the public against bad doctors? J Vasc Surg. 2005 May; 41(5):907-10.
Score: 0.005
-
Damned if you do and damned if you don't: medical ethics and a second career. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Mar; 41(3):556-8.
Score: 0.005
-
The military physician's ethical response to evidence of torture. Surgery. 2004 Nov; 136(5):1090-3.
Score: 0.005
-
Ethics of refusal to treat patients as a social statement. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Nov; 40(5):1057-9.
Score: 0.005
-
Ethical considerations in elective cesarean delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun; 47(2):404-8.
Score: 0.005
-
Ethics of institutional marketing: role of physicians. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Aug; 38(2):409-10.
Score: 0.005
-
Ethics of patenting surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Jan; 37(1):235-6.
Score: 0.004
-
A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 30; 343(22):1621-6.
Score: 0.004
-
Three ethically justified indications for selective termination in multifetal pregnancy: a practical and comprehensive management strategy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995 Sep; 12(8):531-6.
Score: 0.003
-
Ethics in cardiovascular medicine. Task Force III: Perspective on the allocation of limited resources in cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Jul; 16(1):17-23.
Score: 0.002
-
Informed consent and the "medical student psychiatrist". Acad Med. 1990 Feb; 65(2):127-8.
Score: 0.002
-
Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: an indication for obstetric ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Oct; 161(4):857-60.
Score: 0.002
-
Pelvic examinations by medical students. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Oct; 161(4):1013-4.
Score: 0.002
-
Sociopolitical and ethical considerations in the treatment of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Aug; 10(2):14A-7A.
Score: 0.002
-
The ethical implications of medical student involvement in the care and assessment of patients in teaching hospitals--informed consent from patients for student involvement. Part I: A description of the origin and implementation of policies governing medical student interaction with patients and compliance with Federal and JCAH guidelines. Res Med Educ. 1985; 24:138-45.
Score: 0.001
-
The ethical implications of medical student involvement in the care and assessment of patients in teaching hospitals--informed consent from patients for student involvement. Part II: A description of student behavioral practices and perspectives on the issue of informed consent for their involvement in patient care and assessment. Res Med Educ. 1985; 24:146-53.
Score: 0.001