LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH to Physician-Patient Relations
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH has written about Physician-Patient Relations.
Connection Strength
7.851
-
Academic physicians as factory workers: identifying and preventing alienation of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 06; 220(6):558-561.
Score: 0.474
-
What is meant by high-risk informed consent? J Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug; 62(2):510-1.
Score: 0.374
-
Transgression confession: ethics of medical error disclosure. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Dec; 58(6):1697-9.
Score: 0.333
-
Limits of confidentiality: to disclose or not to disclose. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Aug; 58(2):521-3.
Score: 0.325
-
The professional medical ethics model of decision making under conditions of clinical uncertainty. Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb; 70(1 Suppl):141S-158S.
Score: 0.309
-
Addressing requests by patients for nonbeneficial interventions. JAMA. 2012 Jan 11; 307(2):149-50.
Score: 0.292
-
The professional responsibility model of respect for autonomy in decision making about cesarean delivery. Am J Bioeth. 2012; 12(7):1-2.
Score: 0.292
-
An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients. Am J Bioeth. 2011 May; 11(5):39-49.
Score: 0.278
-
Preventing life-sustaining treatment by default. Ann Fam Med. 2011 May-Jun; 9(3):250-6.
Score: 0.278
-
Business dealings with a patient: money never sleeps. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar; 53(3):856-7.
Score: 0.275
-
Was bioethics founded on historical and conceptual mistakes about medical paternalism? Bioethics. 2011 Feb; 25(2):66-74.
Score: 0.274
-
An ethical framework for the responsible management of pregnant patients in a medical disaster. J Clin Ethics. 2011; 22(1):20-4.
Score: 0.272
-
Focus on patient management: responsibly managing psychiatric inpatient refusal of medical or surgical diagnostic work-up. Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Sep; 61(9):868-70.
Score: 0.266
-
Fiduciary economization: your wealth or your health. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Apr; 45(4):858-60.
Score: 0.210
-
Ethics and growing legal crisis in medicine. Croat Med J. 2005 Oct; 46(5):724-7.
Score: 0.189
-
Prescribing viagra in an ethically responsible fashion. J Med Philos. 2004 Dec; 29(6):739-49.
Score: 0.178
-
The moral foundation of medical leadership: the professional virtues of the physician as fiduciary of the patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr; 184(5):875-9; discussion 879-80.
Score: 0.138
-
Conflicts between physicians and patients in non-elective cesarean delivery: incidence and the adequacy of informed consent. Am J Perinatol. 1996 Apr; 13(3):171-6.
Score: 0.098
-
Professional Integrity and the Role of Medical Students in Professional Self-Regulation. Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Jun; 40(3):525-9.
Score: 0.098
-
Physicians' Professionally Responsible Power: A Core Concept of Clinical Ethics. J Med Philos. 2016 Feb; 41(1):1-9.
Score: 0.096
-
Use of a values inventory as a discussion aid about end-of-life care: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Palliat Support Care. 2016 08; 14(4):330-40.
Score: 0.095
-
Preventive ethics, professional integrity, and boundary setting: the clinical management of moral uncertainty. J Med Philos. 1995 Feb; 20(1):1-11.
Score: 0.090
-
FOR: Responding professionally to requests for non-indicated caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2015 Feb; 122(3):360.
Score: 0.090
-
Surgery without consent or miscommunication? A new look at a landmark legal case. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May; 212(5):586-90.
Score: 0.087
-
Ethical dimensions of first-trimester fetal aneuploidy screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar; 57(1):226-31.
Score: 0.085
-
Identifying and managing ethical conflict in the gynecologist-patient relationship. J Reprod Med. 1993 Jul; 38(7):533-7.
Score: 0.081
-
The physician's virtues and legitimate self-interest in the patient-physician contract. Mt Sinai J Med. 1993 Jan; 60(1):11-4.
Score: 0.078
-
The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64.
Score: 0.077
-
Perspective: Medical education in medical ethics and humanities as the foundation for developing medical professionalism. Acad Med. 2012 Mar; 87(3):334-41.
Score: 0.074
-
Patient-originated futility insight: ethical right or ethical plight? J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul; 54(1):237-9.
Score: 0.070
-
The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients". Am J Bioeth. 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7.
Score: 0.070
-
Ethical considerations in first-trimester Down syndrome risk assessment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr; 22(2):135-8.
Score: 0.065
-
The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug; 203(2):101.e1-5.
Score: 0.064
-
Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb; 162(2):303-7.
Score: 0.064
-
La frontera: responsibly managing borders and boundaries in clinical ethics. J Med Philos. 2010 Feb; 35(1):1-6.
Score: 0.063
-
How do we guarantee trainee professional purity? J Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar; 49(3):790-1.
Score: 0.060
-
The abstract character and transforming power of medical language. Soundings. 1989; 72(1):111-25.
Score: 0.059
-
Beyond breaking bad news: the roles of hope and hopefulness. Cancer. 2008 Jul 15; 113(2):442-5.
Score: 0.057
-
An ethical model for improving the patient-physician relationship. Inquiry. 1988; 25(4):454-68.
Score: 0.055
-
The identification, management, and prevention of conflict with faculty and fellows: A practical ethical guide for department chairs and division chiefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec; 197(6):572.e1-5.
Score: 0.055
-
Ethics of over-scheduling: when enough becomes too much. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar; 45(3):635-6.
Score: 0.052
-
When patients request specific interventions: Defining the limits of the physician's obligation. N Engl J Med. 1986 Nov 20; 315(21):1347-51.
Score: 0.051
-
Whodunit? Ghost surgery and ethical billing. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Dec; 42(6):1239-41.
Score: 0.048
-
The ethics of operating on a family member. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Nov; 42(5):1033-5.
Score: 0.048
-
Respect for autonomy and medical paternalism reconsidered. Theor Med. 1985 Oct; 6(3):295-308.
Score: 0.047
-
Withdrawal of life-sustaining low-burden care. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Jul; 42(1):176-7.
Score: 0.046
-
Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making. Med Care. 2005 May; 43(5):466-70.
Score: 0.046
-
Who should protect the public against bad doctors? J Vasc Surg. 2005 May; 41(5):907-10.
Score: 0.046
-
Patients with reduced agency: conceptual, empirical, and ethical considerations. J Med Philos. 1984 Nov; 9(4):329-31.
Score: 0.044
-
Neglected ethical dimensions of the professional liability crisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May; 190(5):1198-200.
Score: 0.043
-
Medical care for elderly patients with diminished competence: an ethical analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1984 Feb; 32(2):150-3.
Score: 0.042
-
A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 06; 140(1):54-9.
Score: 0.042
-
Diminished competence and paternalism: introduction. Theor Med. 1983 Oct; 4(3):227-8.
Score: 0.041
-
What to tell patients harmed by other physicians. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Oct; 38(4):866-7.
Score: 0.041
-
The surgeon's obligations to the noncompliant patient. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Sep; 38(3):626-7.
Score: 0.041
-
Ethics: an essential dimension of clinical obstetric anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2003 May; 96(5):1480-1485.
Score: 0.040
-
Physicians and hospital managers as cofiduciaries of patients: rhetoric or reality? J Healthc Manag. 2003 May-Jun; 48(3):172-9; discussion 180.
Score: 0.040
-
Policy and the physician-patient relationship. New Physician. 1983; 32(2):31-2.
Score: 0.039
-
Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep; 187(3):696-702.
Score: 0.038
-
Medical ethics in the future: commentary on Andre De Vries. Metamedicine. 1982 Feb; 3(1):129-33.
Score: 0.037
-
Trust, moral responsibility, the self, and well-ordered societies: the importance of basic philosophical concepts for clinical ethics. J Med Philos. 2002 Feb; 27(1):3-9.
Score: 0.037
-
Consent for an intraoperative video record. J Vasc Surg. 2001 Dec; 34(6):1133-4.
Score: 0.036
-
Pluralism, philosophies of medicine and the varieties of medical ethics: a commentary on Thomasma and Pellegrino. Metamedicine. 1981 Feb; 2(1):13-7.
Score: 0.034
-
Holding the present and future accountable to the past: history and the maturation of clinical ethics as a field of the humanities. J Med Philos. 2000 Feb; 25(1):5-11.
Score: 0.032
-
Hume's influence on John Gregory and the history of medical ethics. J Med Philos. 1999 Aug; 24(4):376-95.
Score: 0.031
-
Laying medicine open: understanding major turning points in the history of medical ethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Mar; 9(1):7-23.
Score: 0.030
-
Ethical issues in gynecology. Ceska Gynekol. 1998 Apr; 63(2):103-7.
Score: 0.028
-
Historical perspectives on the ethical dimensions of the patient physician relationship: the medical ethics of Dr. John Gregory. Ethics Sci Med. 1978; 5(1):47-53.
Score: 0.028
-
Bioethics in the twenty-first century: why we should pay attention to eighteenth-century medical ethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Dec; 6(4):329-33.
Score: 0.026
-
Reification and synergy in clinical ethics and its adequacy to the managed practice of medicine. J Med Philos. 1996 Feb; 21(1):1-6.
Score: 0.024
-
The indispensable role of professional judgment in genomic medicine. JAMA. 2013 Apr 10; 309(14):1465-6.
Score: 0.020
-
Laying clinical ethics open. J Med Philos. 1993 Feb; 18(1):1-8.
Score: 0.020
-
The professional responsibility model of physician leadership. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb; 208(2):97-101.
Score: 0.018
-
Inadequacies with the ACOG and AAP statements on managing ethical conflict during the intrapartum period. J Clin Ethics. 1991; 2(1):23-4.
Score: 0.017
-
Ethics: an essential dimension of soliciting philanthropic gifts from donors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec; 203(6):540.e1-4.
Score: 0.017
-
A national survey concerning the ethical aspects of informed consent and role of medical students. J Med Educ. 1988 Nov; 63(11):821-9.
Score: 0.015
-
Beyond shared decision making: an expanded typology of medical decisions. Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct; 28(5):699-705.
Score: 0.014
-
Is non-directive counseling for patient choice cesarean delivery ethically justified? J Perinat Med. 2007; 35(6):478-80.
Score: 0.013
-
Ethically justified clinical strategies for promoting geriatric assent. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Feb; 21(2):151-7.
Score: 0.012
-
Perinatal ethics: a practical method of analysis of obligations to mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Sep; 66(3):442-6.
Score: 0.012
-
Ethical dimensions of diagnosis: a case study and analysis. Metamedicine. 1981 Jun; 2(2):129-43.
Score: 0.009
-
Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Apr; 106(4):293-6.
Score: 0.008
-
Responding to the ethical challenges posed by the business tools of managed care in the practice of obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Sep; 175(3 Pt 1):523-7.
Score: 0.006
-
Sociopolitical and ethical considerations in the treatment of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Aug; 10(2):14A-7A.
Score: 0.003