Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by LAURA PETERSEN and SYLVIA HYSONG.
Connection Strength
7.828
-
Beyond Information Design: Designing Health Care Dashboards for Evidence-Driven Decision-Making. Appl Clin Inform. 2023 05; 14(3):465-469.
Score: 0.888
-
Purpose, Subject, and Consumer Comment on "Perceived Burden Due to Registrations for Quality Monitoring and Improvement in Hospitals: A Mixed Methods Study". Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 04 01; 11(4):539-543.
Score: 0.828
-
Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a non-randomised controlled trial study. BJGP Open. 2021 Apr; 5(2).
Score: 0.776
-
Motivating and engaging frontline providers in measuring and improving team clinical performance. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 05; 28(5):405-411.
Score: 0.668
-
Reports of unintended consequences of financial incentives to improve management of hypertension. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0184856.
Score: 0.605
-
A Novel Method for Assessing Task Complexity in Outpatient Clinical-Performance Measures. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 31 Suppl 1:28-35.
Score: 0.546
-
Study protocol: identifying and delivering point-of-care information to improve care coordination. Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 19; 10:145.
Score: 0.529
-
Publishing protocols for partnered research. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec; 29 Suppl 4:820-4.
Score: 0.498
-
Financial incentives and physician commitment to guideline-recommended hypertension management. Am J Manag Care. 2012 10 01; 18(10):e378-91.
Score: 0.429
-
Passive monitoring versus active assessment of clinical performance: impact on measured quality of care. Med Care. 2011 Oct; 49(10):883-90.
Score: 0.400
-
Churning the tides of care: when nurse turnover makes waves in patient access to primary care. BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 10; 23(1):739.
Score: 0.247
-
An evidence-based, structured, expert approach to selecting essential indicators of primary care quality. PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0261263.
Score: 0.204
-
An Alternative Method of Public Reporting of Comparative Hospital Quality and Performance Data for Transparency Initiatives. Med Care. 2021 09 01; 59(9):816-823.
Score: 0.199
-
Impact of team configuration and team stability on primary care quality. Implement Sci. 2019 03 06; 14(1):22.
Score: 0.167
-
Unpacking Care Coordination Through a Multiteam System Lens: A Conceptual Framework and Systematic Review. Med Care. 2018 03; 56(3):247-259.
Score: 0.156
-
Theory-based and evidence-based design of audit and feedback programmes: examples from two clinical intervention studies. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 04; 26(4):323-334.
Score: 0.138
-
Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013 Sep 11; 310(10):1042-50.
Score: 0.114
-
Correlation of neonatal intensive care unit performance across multiple measures of quality of care. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jan; 167(1):47-54.
Score: 0.109
-
Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of a cluster randomized controlled trial of pay for performance for hypertension treatment: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011 Oct 03; 6:114.
Score: 0.100
-
Improving benchmarking by using an explicit framework for the development of composite indicators: an example using pediatric quality of care. Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 09; 5:13.
Score: 0.089
-
Nurse Leader Perceptions of Data in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Evaluation. Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Sep 01; 41(9):679-686.
Score: 0.057
-
Baby-MONITOR: a composite indicator of NICU quality. Pediatrics. 2014 Jul; 134(1):74-82.
Score: 0.030
-
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire as a tool for benchmarking safety culture in the NICU. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Mar; 97(2):F127-32.
Score: 0.026
-
Neonatal intensive care unit safety culture varies widely. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Mar; 97(2):F120-6.
Score: 0.025