Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by DEAN SITTIG and HARDEEP SINGH.
Connection Strength
29.032
-
Five Strategies for a Safer EHR Modernization Journey. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 10; 38(Suppl 4):940-942.
Score: 0.923
-
i-CLIMATE: a "clinical climate informatics" action framework to reduce environmental pollution from healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 11 14; 29(12):2153-2160.
Score: 0.869
-
Applying requisite imagination to safeguard electronic health record transitions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 04 13; 29(5):1014-1018.
Score: 0.834
-
Guidelines for US Hospitals and Clinicians on Assessment of Electronic Health Record Safety Using SAFER Guides. JAMA. 2022 Feb 22; 327(8):719-720.
Score: 0.826
-
Policies to Promote Shared Responsibility for Safer Electronic Health Records. JAMA. 2021 Oct 19; 326(15):1477-1478.
Score: 0.807
-
How can we partner with electronic health record vendors on the complex journey to safer health care? J Healthc Risk Manag. 2020 Oct; 40(2):34-43.
Score: 0.738
-
COVID-19 and the Need for a National Health Information Technology Infrastructure. JAMA. 2020 06 16; 323(23):2373-2374.
Score: 0.735
-
A Sociotechnical Framework for Safety-Related Electronic Health Record Research Reporting: The SAFER Reporting Framework. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S92-S100.
Score: 0.733
-
Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety. Health Informatics J. 2020 03; 26(1):181-189.
Score: 0.662
-
Adherence to recommended electronic health record safety practices across eight health care organizations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 07 01; 25(7):913-918.
Score: 0.642
-
Toward More Proactive Approaches to Safety in the Electronic Health Record Era. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 10; 43(10):540-547.
Score: 0.605
-
Improving the safety of health information technology requires shared responsibility: It is time we all step up. Healthc (Amst). 2018 Mar; 6(1):7-12.
Score: 0.600
-
A Socio-Technical Approach to Preventing, Mitigating, and Recovering from Ransomware Attacks. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):624-32.
Score: 0.558
-
Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr; 25(4):226-32.
Score: 0.529
-
Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):900-4.
Score: 0.511
-
Setting the record straight on measuring diagnostic errors. Reply to: 'Bad assumptions on primary care diagnostic errors' by Dr Richard Young. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May; 24(5):345-8.
Score: 0.511
-
Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb; 24(2):103-10.
Score: 0.505
-
Patient safety goals for the proposed Federal Health Information Technology Safety Center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar; 22(2):472-8.
Score: 0.497
-
Which electronic health record is better: A or B? Realities of comparing the effectiveness of electronic health records. J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Sep; 3(5):447-50.
Score: 0.492
-
Contingency planning for electronic health record-based care continuity: a survey of recommended practices. Int J Med Inform. 2014 Nov; 83(11):797-804.
Score: 0.490
-
Were my diagnosis and treatment correct? No news is not necessarily good news. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug; 29(8):1087-9.
Score: 0.489
-
The SAFER guides: empowering organizations to improve the safety and effectiveness of electronic health records. Am J Manag Care. 2014 May; 20(5):418-23.
Score: 0.481
-
ONC issues guides for SAFER EHRs. J AHIMA. 2014 Apr; 85(4):50-2.
Score: 0.478
-
Toward electronic medical record alerts that consume less physician time--reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14; 173(18):1756.
Score: 0.463
-
Information overload and missed test results in electronic health record-based settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22; 173(8):702-4.
Score: 0.448
-
Safety Assurance Factors for Electronic Health Record Resilience (SAFER): study protocol. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 12; 13:46.
Score: 0.447
-
Sociotechnical evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of point-of-care mobile computing devices: a case study conducted in India. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:515-9.
Score: 0.438
-
A red-flag-based approach to risk management of EHR-related safety concerns. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013; 33(2):21-6.
Score: 0.438
-
Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug; 20(4):727-35.
Score: 0.438
-
Electronic health records and national patient-safety goals. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 08; 367(19):1854-60.
Score: 0.434
-
Improving test result follow-up through electronic health records requires more than just an alert. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct; 27(10):1235-7.
Score: 0.431
-
Rights and responsibilities of users of electronic health records. CMAJ. 2012 Sep 18; 184(13):1479-83.
Score: 0.412
-
Creating an oversight infrastructure for electronic health record-related patient safety hazards. J Patient Saf. 2011 Dec; 7(4):169-74.
Score: 0.407
-
Defining health information technology-related errors: new developments since to err is human. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jul 25; 171(14):1281-4.
Score: 0.397
-
Legal, ethical, and financial dilemmas in electronic health record adoption and use. Pediatrics. 2011 Apr; 127(4):e1042-7.
Score: 0.387
-
A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct; 19 Suppl 3:i68-74.
Score: 0.375
-
Ten strategies to improve management of abnormal test result alerts in the electronic health record. J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun; 6(2):121-3.
Score: 0.366
-
Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 09; 9:49.
Score: 0.354
-
Eight rights of safe electronic health record use. JAMA. 2009 Sep 09; 302(10):1111-3.
Score: 0.348
-
Improving clinical quality indicators through electronic health records: it takes more than just a reminder. Pediatrics. 2009 Jul; 124(1):375-7.
Score: 0.344
-
Maximizing the Ability of Health IT and AI to Improve Patient Safety. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Oct 28.
Score: 0.249
-
Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 08 18; 30(9):1526-1531.
Score: 0.229
-
Translating electronic health record-based patient safety algorithms from research to clinical practice at multiple sites. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Jul; 29(1).
Score: 0.212
-
Reporting Outcomes of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients to Referring Physicians via an Electronic Health Record-Based Feedback System. Appl Clin Inform. 2022 03; 13(2):495-503.
Score: 0.210
-
An Operational Framework to Study Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Departments: Findings From A Consensus Panel. J Patient Saf. 2021 12 01; 17(8):570-575.
Score: 0.203
-
Dashboards for visual display of patient safety data: a systematic review. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Oct; 28(1).
Score: 0.201
-
Validation of an electronic trigger to measure missed diagnosis of stroke in emergency departments. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 09 18; 28(10):2202-2211.
Score: 0.200
-
Bridging the feedback gap: a sociotechnical approach to informing clinicians of patients' subsequent clinical course and outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 07; 30(7):591-597.
Score: 0.195
-
Fighting a common enemy: a catalyst to close intractable safety gaps. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 02; 30(2):141-145.
Score: 0.185
-
Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 06 01; 3(6):e206752.
Score: 0.183
-
An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912638.
Score: 0.175
-
Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 09; 34(9):1825-1832.
Score: 0.172
-
Barriers and facilitators impacting reliability of the electronic health record-facilitated total testing process. Int J Med Inform. 2019 07; 127:102-108.
Score: 0.169
-
Essential activities for electronic health record safety: A qualitative study. Health Informatics J. 2020 12; 26(4):3140-3151.
Score: 0.168
-
Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 02; 28(2):151-159.
Score: 0.163
-
Electronic health record reviews to measure diagnostic uncertainty in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 06; 24(3):545-551.
Score: 0.158
-
Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 04 01; 25(4):440-446.
Score: 0.158
-
Electronic Triggers to Identify Delays in Follow-Up of Mammography: Harnessing the Power of Big Data in Health?Care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 02; 15(2):287-295.
Score: 0.153
-
An electronic trigger based on care escalation to identify preventable adverse events in hospitalised patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 03; 27(3):241-246.
Score: 0.152
-
Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 01; 33(1):103-115.
Score: 0.152
-
Development and Validation of Trigger Algorithms to Identify Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation of Gastroenterological Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan; 16(1):90-98.
Score: 0.151
-
Application of Electronic Algorithms to Improve Diagnostic Evaluation for Bladder Cancer. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 03 22; 8(1):279-290.
Score: 0.147
-
Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01; 24(2):261-267.
Score: 0.146
-
Electronic Detection of Delayed Test Result Follow-Up in Patients with Hypothyroidism. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul; 32(7):753-759.
Score: 0.145
-
Electronic Health Records Quantify Previously Existing Phenomenon-Physicians Spend Hours Coordinating Care-Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 08 01; 176(8):1235-6.
Score: 0.140
-
Challenges in patient safety improvement research in the era of electronic health records. Healthc (Amst). 2016 Dec; 4(4):285-290.
Score: 0.140
-
Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):543-59.
Score: 0.139
-
Computerized Triggers of Big Data to Detect?Delays in Follow-up of Chest Imaging?Results. Chest. 2016 09; 150(3):613-20.
Score: 0.138
-
The Burden of Inbox Notifications in Commercial Electronic Health Records. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):559-60.
Score: 0.137
-
How context affects electronic health record-based test result follow-up: a mixed-methods evaluation. BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 11; 4(11):e005985.
Score: 0.125
-
Electronic alerts and clinician turnover: the influence of user acceptance. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Nov; 20(11 Spec No. 17):SP520-30.
Score: 0.124
-
Ebola US Patient Zero: lessons on misdiagnosis and effective use of electronic health records. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014; 1(4):283-287.
Score: 0.124
-
Resilient Practices in Maintaining Safety of Health Information Technologies. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak. 2014 Sep; 8(3):265-282.
Score: 0.123
-
Development and field testing of a self-assessment guide for computer-based provider order entry. J Healthc Manag. 2014 Sep-Oct; 59(5):338-52.
Score: 0.123
-
An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec; 21(6):1053-9.
Score: 0.121
-
Electronic health record-related safety concerns: a cross-sectional survey. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014; 34(1):14-26.
Score: 0.117
-
Rights and responsibilities of electronic health records (EHR) users caring for children. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2013 12; 111(6):468-71.
Score: 0.117
-
Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug; 21(4):737-41.
Score: 0.116
-
Effectiveness of an electronic health record-based intervention to improve follow-up of abnormal pathology results: a retrospective record analysis. Med Care. 2012 Oct; 50(10):898-904.
Score: 0.108
-
Improving the effectiveness of electronic health record-based referral processes. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 13; 12:107.
Score: 0.107
-
Electronic health record-based messages to primary care providers: valuable information or just noise? Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 13; 172(3):283-5.
Score: 0.103
-
Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. Am J Med. 2012 Feb; 125(2):209.e1-7.
Score: 0.103
-
A prototype knowledge base and SMART app to facilitate organization of patient medications by clinical problems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011; 2011:888-94.
Score: 0.101
-
Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis. Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 27; 6:84.
Score: 0.099
-
Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Apr 12; 11:22.
Score: 0.097
-
Summarization of clinical information: a conceptual model. J Biomed Inform. 2011 Aug; 44(4):688-99.
Score: 0.097
-
Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan; 26(1):64-9.
Score: 0.093
-
Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010 Mar; 123(3):238-44.
Score: 0.090
-
Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb; 17(1):71-7.
Score: 0.089
-
Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28; 169(17):1578-86.
Score: 0.087
-
Improving outpatient safety through effective electronic communication: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2009 Sep 25; 4:62.
Score: 0.087
-
Application of Human Factors Methods to Understand Missed Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results. Appl Clin Inform. 2020 10; 11(5):692-698.
Score: 0.047
-
Detection and Remediation of Misidentification Errors in Radiology Examination Ordering. Appl Clin Inform. 2020 01; 11(1):79-87.
Score: 0.045
-
Methods for Patient-Centered Interface Design of Test Result Display in Online Portals. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018 Jun 26; 6(1):15.
Score: 0.040
-
Variation in high-priority drug-drug interaction alerts across institutions and electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):331-338.
Score: 0.037
-
Patient portals and health apps: Pitfalls, promises, and what one might learn from the other. Healthc (Amst). 2017 Sep; 5(3):81-85.
Score: 0.036
-
Reducing Unnecessary Shoulder MRI Examinations Within a Capitated Health Care System: A Potential Role for Shoulder Ultrasound. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Jul; 13(7):780-7.
Score: 0.035
-
Exploring the sociotechnical intersection of patient safety and electronic health record implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb; 21(e1):e28-34.
Score: 0.029