Connection

LI WANG to Reproducibility of Results

This is a "connection" page, showing publications LI WANG has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Connection Strength

0.422
  1. Comparison of Intraoperative Aberrometry, OCT-Based IOL Formula, Haigis-L, and Masket Formulae for IOL Power Calculation after Laser Vision Correction. Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun; 122(6):1096-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  2. Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Nov; 37(11):2018-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  3. Evaluation of intraocular lens power prediction methods using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Post-Keratorefractive Intraocular Lens Power Calculator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Sep; 36(9):1466-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  4. Repeatability of corneal power and wavefront aberration measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug Placido corneal topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Mar; 36(3):425-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  5. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2004 Oct; 111(10):1825-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  6. Evaluation of refractive error measurements of the Wavescan Wavefront system and the Tracey Wavefront aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 May; 29(5):970-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  7. Comparison of a ray-tracing refractometer, autorefractor, and computerized videokeratography in measuring pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Feb; 28(2):276-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  8. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar; 41(3):548-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  9. Repeatability of corneal epithelial thickness measurements using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. Cornea. 2013 Dec; 32(12):1544-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  10. Repeatability and comparability of corneal thickness measurements obtained from Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and from ultrasonic pachymetry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul; 251(7):1855-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  11. Intraocular lens power calculation after previous myopic laser vision correction based on corneal power measured by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Apr; 38(4):589-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  12. Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using automated keratometry, a Placido-based corneal topographer, and a combined Placido-based and dual Scheimpflug corneal topographer. Cornea. 2010 Oct; 29(10):1136-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  13. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct; 148(4):528-535.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  14. Accuracy of modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas in refractive lens exchange for high myopia and high hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jul; 35(7):1181-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  15. A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2002 Apr; 109(4):651-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  16. Keratoconus evaluation using the Orbscan Topography System. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Feb; 26(2):222-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.