Connection

DAVID BATES to United States

This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about United States.
Connection Strength

3.634
  1. Safety of inpatient care in surgical settings: cohort study. BMJ. 2024 Nov 13; 387:e080480.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  2. Leveraging large language models to foster equity in healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Sep 01; 31(9):2147-2150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  3. Cost Savings Associated With Implementing 4 Total Joint Replacement Electronic Clinical Quality Measures Nationally: 2020-2040. J Patient Saf. 2023 12 01; 19(8):539-546.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  4. Cost of Inpatient Falls and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Implementation of an Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Program. JAMA Health Forum. 2023 01 06; 4(1):e225125.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  5. The Association of the First Surge of the COVID-19 Pandemic with the High- and Low-Value Outpatient Care Delivered to Adults in the USA. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 11; 37(15):3979-3988.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  6. Digital Inclusion as Health Care - Supporting Health Care Equity with Digital-Infrastructure Initiatives. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24; 386(12):1101-1103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  7. Development of four electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) for use in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) following elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021; 2021:408-417.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  8. A Monte Carlo Simulation to Estimate the Additional Cost Associated With Adverse Medication Events Leading to Intraoperative Hypotension and/or Hypertension in the United States. J Patient Saf. 2021 12 01; 17(8):e758-e764.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  9. Assessing hospital electronic health record vendor performance across publicly reported quality measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 09 18; 28(10):2101-2107.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  10. Association of Hospital Public Quality Reporting With Electronic Health Record Medication Safety Performance. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 09 01; 4(9):e2125173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  11. The Development and Piloting of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool: Lessons Learned. Appl Clin Inform. 2021 01; 12(1):153-163.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  12. Effect of an Online Weight Management Program Integrated With Population Health Management on Weight Change: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 11 03; 324(17):1737-1746.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  13. The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: Data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 08 01; 27(8):1252-1258.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  14. National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 05 01; 3(5):e205547.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  15. Technology-facilitated care coordination in rural areas: What is needed? Int J Med Inform. 2020 05; 137:104102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  16. Intravenous Infusion Administration: A Comparative Study of Practices and Errors Between the United States and England and Their Implications for Patient Safety. Drug Saf. 2019 10; 42(10):1157-1165.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  17. Assessing the safety of electronic health records: a national longitudinal study of medication-related decision support. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 01; 29(1):52-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  18. Evidence-Based Medicine and the American Thoracic Society Guidelines. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 07 01; 179(7):1002-1003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  19. Improving Electronic Health Record Usability and Safety Requires Transparency. JAMA. 2018 Dec 25; 320(24):2533-2534.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  20. Health Apps and Health Policy: What Is Needed? JAMA. 2018 11 20; 320(19):1975-1976.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  21. The national cost of adverse drug events resulting from inappropriate medication-related alert overrides in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 09 01; 25(9):1183-1188.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  22. Interoperability: What Is It, How Can We Make It Work for Clinicians, and How Should We Measure It in the Future? Health Serv Res. 2018 10; 53(5):3270-3277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  23. The role of social media around patient experience and engagement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 10; 26(10):845-848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  24. Using the Electronic Health Record to Understand and Minimize Overuse. JAMA. 2017 01 17; 317(3):257-258.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  25. The Big Phish: Cyberattacks Against U.S. Healthcare Systems. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 10; 31(10):1115-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  26. Patient Relationship Management: What the U.S. Healthcare System Can Learn from Other Industries. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 01; 32(1):101-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  27. Care coordination gaps due to lack of interoperability in the United States: a qualitative study and literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 22; 16:143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  28. Evaluation of Perioperative Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan; 124(1):25-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  29. Acceptability and feasibility of the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool for hospitals outside the United States. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep; 84(9):694-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  30. Leveraging health information technology to achieve the "triple aim" of healthcare reform. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):849-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  31. Adoption of electronic health records in UK hospitals: lessons from the USA. Lancet. 2014 Jul 05; 384(9937):8-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  32. A patient-centered longitudinal care plan: vision versus reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec; 21(6):1082-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  33. Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul; 33(7):1123-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  34. In search of a few good apps. JAMA. 2014 May 14; 311(18):1851-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  35. A risk-based regulatory framework for health IT: recommendations of the FDASIA working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e181-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  36. Disclosing medical errors: the view from the USA. Surgeon. 2014 Apr; 12(2):64-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  37. Care partners and online patient portals. JAMA. 2014 Jan 22-29; 311(4):357-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  38. Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Dec 9-23; 173(22):2039-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  39. The current capabilities of health information technology to support care transitions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013:1231.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  40. Patient-centred healthcare, social media and the internet: the perfect storm? BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Mar; 22(3):183-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  41. Development of a web-based observational tool for detecting intravenous medication errors with smart infusion pumps. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:1102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  42. Preoperative hyponatremia and perioperative complications. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 22; 172(19):1474-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  43. Policy initiatives for health information technology: a qualitative study of U.S. expectations and Canada's experience. Int J Med Inform. 2012 Oct; 81(10):713-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  44. Standard practices for computerized clinical decision support in community hospitals: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec; 19(6):980-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  45. Uncovering the blind spot of patient satisfaction: an international survey. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Nov; 20(11):959-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  46. Lessons from the Canadian national health information technology plan for the United States: opinions of key Canadian experts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun; 19(3):453-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  47. Factors influencing alert acceptance: a novel approach for predicting the success of clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug; 18(4):479-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  48. Development of a tool within the electronic medical record to facilitate medication reconciliation after hospital discharge. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 01; 18(3):309-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  49. The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28; 171(6):568-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  50. Impact of implementing alerts about medication black-box warnings in electronic health records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Feb; 20(2):192-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  51. Secondary use of electronic health record data: spontaneous triggered adverse drug event reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Dec; 19(12):1211-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  52. E-cigarettes: a rapidly growing Internet phenomenon. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Nov 02; 153(9):607-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  53. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr; 29(4):614-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  54. Improving safety and eliminating redundant tests: cutting costs in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct; 28(5):1475-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  55. Commentary: nursing and health information technology. Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct; 56(5):237.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  56. Health information exchange and patient safety. J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec; 40(6 Suppl):S40-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  57. Drug withdrawals in the United States: a systematic review of the evidence and analysis of trends. Curr Drug Saf. 2007 Sep; 2(3):177-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  58. Preventing medication errors: a summary. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jul 15; 64(14 Suppl 9):S3-9; quiz S24-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  59. Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr; 14(2):191-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  60. Leveraging information technology to improve quality and safety. Yearb Med Inform. 2007; 22-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  61. The "To Err is Human" report and the patient safety literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun; 15(3):174-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  62. Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct; 24(5):1180-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  63. Computerized physician order entry and medication errors: finding a balance. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Aug; 38(4):259-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  64. Variability in intravenous medication practices: implications for medication safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Apr; 31(4):203-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  65. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Jun; 38(3):176-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  66. Comparative risk of mortality in new users of prescription opioids for noncancer pain: results from the International Pharmacosurveillance Study. Pain. 2025 May 01; 166(5):1118-1127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  67. Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb; 12(1):8-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  68. The role of primary care non-physician clinic staff in e-mail communication with patients. Int J Med Inform. 2004 May; 73(4):333-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  69. Patient Safety Indicators During the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic Surge in the United States. J Patient Saf. 2024 Jun 01; 20(4):247-251.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  70. The National Alliance for Primary Care Informatics: development and current status. Inform Prim Care. 2004; 12(3):183-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  71. Disparity dashboards: an evaluation of the literature and framework for health equity improvement. Lancet Digit Health. 2023 11; 5(11):e831-e839.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  72. Stimulant Drugs and Stimulant Use Disorder. Anesthesiol Clin. 2024 Mar; 42(1):103-115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  73. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA. 2003 Mar 05; 289(9):1107-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  74. A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb; 10(1):1-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  75. Electronic Health Record Legal Settlements in the US Since the 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act. JAMA Health Forum. 2022 11 04; 3(11):e223872.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  76. Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep; 11(3):261-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  77. Association between state-level malpractice environment and clinician electronic health record (EHR) time. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 05 11; 29(6):1069-1077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  78. Engaging Patients in the Use of Real-Time Electronic Clinical Data to Improve the Safety and Reliability of Their Own Care. J Patient Saf. 2022 03 01; 18(2):e407-e413.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  79. Testing of a Risk-Standardized Complication Rate Electronic Clinical Quality Measure (eCQM) for Total Hip and/or Total Knee Arthroplasty. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021; 2021:352-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  80. Testing of a Risk-Standardized Major Bleeding and Venous Thromboembolism Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Elective Total Hip and/or Knee Arthroplasties. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021; 2021:736-743.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  81. Opioid prescribing among new users for non-cancer pain in the USA, Canada, UK, and Taiwan: A population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2021 11; 18(11):e1003829.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  82. Telehealth in US hospitals: State-level reimbursement policies no longer influence adoption rates. Int J Med Inform. 2021 09; 153:104540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  83. Utilizing health information technology in the treatment and management of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from international case study sites. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 07 14; 28(7):1555-1563.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  84. Asthma Exacerbations in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Asthma on Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 04 01; 203(7):831-840.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  85. ASHP Foundation Pharmacy Forecast 2021: Strategic Planning Advice for Pharmacy Departments in Hospitals and Health Systems. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021 03 05; 78(6):472-497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  86. Costs of drug-related morbidity and mortality: enormous and growing rapidly. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2001 Mar-Apr; 41(2):156-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  87. Assessment of Electronic Health Record Use Between US and Non-US Health Systems. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 02 01; 181(2):251-259.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  88. Development and Alpha Testing of Specifications for a Prolonged Opioid Prescribing Electronic Clinical Quality Measure (eCQM). AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020; 2020:1022-1030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  89. The impact of the Internet on quality measurement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Nov-Dec; 19(6):104-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  90. Prediction rules for complications in coronary bypass surgery: a comparison and methodological critique. Med Care. 2000 Aug; 38(8):820-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  91. Error in medicine: what have we learned? Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 02; 132(9):763-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  92. The use of information technology in improving medical performance. Part I. Information systems for medical transactions. MedGenMed. 2000 Feb 07; 2(1):E14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  93. Patient risk factors for adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. ADE Prevention Study Group. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Nov 22; 159(21):2553-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  94. Does a year make a difference? Changes in physician satisfaction and perception in an increasingly capitated environment. Am J Med. 1999 Jul; 107(1):38-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  95. Hospitalism in the USA. Lancet. 1999 Jun 05; 353(9168):1902.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  96. Multinational comparison of new antidepressant use in older adults: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019 05 14; 9(5):e027663.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  97. Sleep and Alertness in a Duty-Hour Flexibility Trial in Internal Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2019 03 07; 380(10):915-923.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  98. Screening for adverse events. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Feb; 5(1):23-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  99. Improving the use of therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther Drug Monit. 1998 Oct; 20(5):550-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  100. Development of the individualised Comparative Effectiveness of Models Optimizing Patient Safety and Resident Education (iCOMPARE) trial: a protocol summary of a national cluster-randomised trial of resident duty hour policies in internal medicine. BMJ Open. 2018 09 21; 8(9):e021711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  101. Physician Burnout in the Electronic Health Record Era: Are We Ignoring the Real Cause? Ann Intern Med. 2018 07 03; 169(1):50-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  102. Clinical decision support alert malfunctions: analysis and empirically derived taxonomy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 05 01; 25(5):496-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  103. Towards Analytics of the Patient and Family Perspective: A Case Study and Recommendations for Data Capture of Safety and Quality Concerns. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017; 2017:615-624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  104. What proportion of common diagnostic tests appear redundant? Am J Med. 1998 Apr; 104(4):361-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  105. Education Outcomes in a Duty-Hour Flexibility Trial in Internal Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19; 378(16):1494-1508.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  106. Strategies for physician education in therapeutic drug monitoring. Clin Chem. 1998 Feb; 44(2):401-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  107. High-priority and low-priority drug-drug interactions in different international electronic health record systems: A comparative study. Int J Med Inform. 2018 03; 111:165-171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  108. A Way Forward for Bipartisan Health Reform? Democrat and Republican State Legislator Priorities for the Goals of Health Policy. Am J Public Health. 2017 10; 107(10):1601-1603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  109. Outpatient CPOE orders discontinued due to 'erroneous entry': prospective survey of prescribers' explanations for errors. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 04; 27(4):293-298.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  110. Commentary: quality, costs, privacy and electronic medical data. J Law Med Ethics. 1997 Summer-Fall; 25(2-3):111-2, 82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  111. Prevalence of food allergies and intolerances documented in electronic health records. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Dec; 140(6):1587-1591.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  112. Changes in the quality of care during progress from stage 1 to stage 2 of Meaningful Use. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):394-397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  113. Six ways for governments to get value from health IT. Lancet. 2016 May 21; 387(10033):2074-2075.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  114. Ten key considerations for the successful optimization of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 01; 24(1):182-187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  115. Recommendations for selecting drug-drug interactions for clinical decision support. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Apr 15; 73(8):576-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  116. Nurses' Perspectives on Patient Satisfaction and Expectations: An International Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Jun; 13(3):185-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  117. The vulnerabilities of computerized physician order entry systems: a qualitative study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar; 23(2):311-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  118. Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct; 84(10):784-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  119. A multidisciplinary three-phase approach to improve the clinical utility of patient safety indicators. Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Apr-Jun; 24(2):62-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  120. Computerised physician order entry-related medication errors: analysis of reported errors and vulnerability testing of current systems. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Apr; 24(4):264-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  121. High Override Rate for Opioid Drug-allergy Interaction Alerts: Current Trends and Recommendations for Future. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:242-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  122. Using electronic health record clinical decision support is associated with improved quality of care. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Oct 01; 20(10):e445-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  123. Impact of sepsis on risk of postoperative arterial and venous thromboses: large prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014 Sep 08; 349:g5334.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  124. Electronic problem list documentation of chronic kidney disease and quality of care. BMC Nephrol. 2014 May 04; 15:70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  125. A comparison of case definitions of chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan; 18 Suppl 1:S11-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  126. Computerized physician order entry and quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care. 1994; 2(4):18-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  127. Prevalence of fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome in a primary care practice. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Dec 27; 153(24):2759-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  128. Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify. J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  129. The impact of medical informatics on patient satisfaction: a USA-based literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Mar; 82(3):141-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  130. National efforts to improve health information system safety in Canada, the United States of America and England. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May; 82(5):e149-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  131. The meaningful use regulations in information technology: what do they mean for quality improvement in hospitals? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Jul; 37(7):333-6, 289.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  132. A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17; 154(10):666-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  133. Advancing the science of patient safety. Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17; 154(10):693-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  134. Governance for clinical decision support: case studies and recommended practices from leading institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr; 18(2):187-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  135. Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 06; 362(18):1698-707.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  136. Rationale and design of the Pharmacist Intervention for Low Literacy in Cardiovascular Disease (PILL-CVD) study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar; 3(2):212-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  137. Protecting an endangered species: training physicians to conduct clinical research. Acad Med. 2009 Apr; 84(4):439-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  138. Evaluation of the contributions of an electronic web-based reporting system: enabling action. J Patient Saf. 2009 Mar; 5(1):9-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  139. Electronic results management in pediatric ambulatory care: qualitative assessment. Pediatrics. 2009 Jan; 123 Suppl 2:S85-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  140. The value of provider-to-provider telehealth. Telemed J E Health. 2008 Jun; 14(5):446-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  141. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jul 09; 167(13):1400-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  142. Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Sep 19; 145(6):426-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  143. E-Prescribing collaboration in Massachusetts: early experiences from regional prescribing projects. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 May-Jun; 13(3):239-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  144. Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Jan 05; 6:1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  145. Antibiotic treatment of children with sore throat. JAMA. 2005 Nov 09; 294(18):2315-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  146. Functional gaps in attaining a national health information network. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct; 24(5):1281-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  147. The costs of a national health information network. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 02; 143(3):165-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  148. Antivirals and antibiotics for influenza in the United States, 1995--2002. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug; 14(8):531-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  149. Determinants of racial/ethnic differences in blood pressure management among hypertensive patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005 Jun 22; 5(1):16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  150. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun; Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  151. Determinants of JNC VI guideline adherence, intensity of drug therapy, and blood pressure control by race and ethnicity. Hypertension. 2004 Oct; 44(4):429-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  152. Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug; 23(4):184-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  153. Relationship of pulmonary artery catheter use to mortality and resource utilization in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec; 31(12):2734-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  154. Severe sepsis: variation in resource and therapeutic modality use among academic centers. Crit Care. 2003 Jun; 7(3):R24-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  155. Defining the priorities and challenges for the adoption of Information Technology in HealthCare: opinions from an expert panel. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 881.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  156. Overcoming the barriers to the implementing computerized physician order entry systems in US hospitals: perspectives from senior management. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  157. A prospective evaluation of the CD14 and CD18 gene polymorphisms and risk of stroke. Stroke. 2002 Apr; 33(4):892-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  158. A prospective evaluation of the heat shock protein 70 gene polymorphisms and the risk of stroke. Thromb Haemost. 2002 Apr; 87(4):622-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  159. Costs, outcomes, and patient satisfaction by provider type for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a critical review of the literature and proposed methodologic standards. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 01; 127(1):52-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  160. The appropriateness of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in academic medical centers. Working Group of the Appropriateness Project of the Academic Medical Center Consortium. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jul 01; 125(1):8-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.