DAVID BATES to Data Collection
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Data Collection.
Connection Strength
2.151
-
Evaluation of intravenous medication errors with smart infusion pumps in an academic medical center. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013:1089-98.
Score: 0.367
-
Getting Value From Electronic Health Records: Research Needed to Improve Practice. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S130-S136.
Score: 0.145
-
Evaluation of Harm Associated with High Dose-Range Clinical Decision Support Overrides in the Intensive Care Unit. Drug Saf. 2019 04; 42(4):573-579.
Score: 0.133
-
Towards Analytics of the Patient and Family Perspective: A Case Study and Recommendations for Data Capture of Safety and Quality Concerns. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017; 2017:615-624.
Score: 0.125
-
Increasing patient engagement: patients' responses to viewing problem lists online. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(4):930-42.
Score: 0.099
-
Secondary use of electronic health record data: spontaneous triggered adverse drug event reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Dec; 19(12):1211-5.
Score: 0.075
-
Participation in an ambulatory e-pharmacovigilance system. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Sep; 19(9):961-9.
Score: 0.074
-
Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: making sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Sep; 36(9):402-10.
Score: 0.074
-
Measuring patient safety: the need for prospective detection of adverse events. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009; 148:3.
Score: 0.066
-
Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr; 14(2):191-7.
Score: 0.057
-
Do physicians take action on high risk family history information provided by patients outside of a clinic visit? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007; 129(Pt 1):13-7.
Score: 0.057
-
Use and perceived benefits of handheld computer-based clinical references. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec; 13(6):619-26.
Score: 0.056
-
Improving electronic health record (EHR) accuracy and increasing compliance with health maintenance clinical guidelines through patient access and input. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Oct-Nov; 75(10-11):693-700.
Score: 0.053
-
How accurate is information that patients contribute to their Electronic Health Record? AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 834-8.
Score: 0.050
-
Primary care clinician attitudes towards ambulatory computerized physician order entry. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 961.
Score: 0.050
-
Use and perceived benefits of handheld PDA clinical reference applications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1099.
Score: 0.050
-
Patients' perceptions of a Web portal offering clinic messaging and personal health information. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1147.
Score: 0.050
-
The role of primary care non-physician clinic staff in e-mail communication with patients. Int J Med Inform. 2004 May; 73(4):333-40.
Score: 0.047
-
Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17; 348(16):1556-64.
Score: 0.044
-
Primary care clinician attitudes towards electronic clinical reminders and clinical practice guidelines. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 848.
Score: 0.043
-
Physicians' perceptions toward electronic communication with patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 972.
Score: 0.043
-
Real-time notification of laboratory data requested by users through alphanumeric pagers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 May-Jun; 9(3):217-22.
Score: 0.041
-
Clinician use of a palmtop drug reference guide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 May-Jun; 9(3):223-9.
Score: 0.041
-
Artificial intelligence in oncology: Path to implementation. Cancer Med. 2021 06; 10(12):4138-4149.
Score: 0.039
-
The Riyadh Declaration: the role of digital health in fighting pandemics. Lancet. 2020 11 14; 396(10262):1537-1539.
Score: 0.037
-
Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Sep; 15(9):626-31.
Score: 0.037
-
Using electronic data to predict the probability of true bacteremia from positive blood cultures. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000; 893-7.
Score: 0.035
-
User Requirements for a Chronic Kidney Disease Clinical Decision Support Tool to Promote Timely Referral. Int J Med Inform. 2017 05; 101:50-57.
Score: 0.029
-
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify. J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89.
Score: 0.023
-
Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun; 21(3):473-80.
Score: 0.023
-
A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17; 154(10):666-71.
Score: 0.019
-
Electronic results management in pediatric ambulatory care: qualitative assessment. Pediatrics. 2009 Jan; 123 Suppl 2:S85-91.
Score: 0.016
-
Quantifying nursing workflow in medication administration. J Nurs Adm. 2008 Jan; 38(1):19-26.
Score: 0.015
-
The cost of information technology-enabled diabetes management. Dis Manag. 2007 Jun; 10(3):115-28.
Score: 0.015
-
Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug; 23(4):184-90.
Score: 0.012
-
Epidemiology of sepsis syndrome in 8 academic medical centers. JAMA. 1997 Jul 16; 278(3):234-40.
Score: 0.007
-
Representing hospital events as complex conditionals. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995; 137-41.
Score: 0.006