Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by LISA MARIE LOWENSTEIN and ROBERT VOLK.
Connection Strength

7.550
  1. A protocol for a cluster randomized trial of care delivery models to improve the quality of smoking cessation and shared decision making for lung cancer screening. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 05; 128:107141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.885
  2. Smoking cessation services and shared decision-making practices among lung cancer screening facilities: A cross-sectional study. Cancer. 2022 05 15; 128(10):1967-1975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.822
  3. Implementing Decision Coaching for Lung Cancer Screening in the Low-Dose Computed Tomography Setting. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 08; 16(8):e703-e725.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.721
  4. Randomized trial of a patient-centered decision aid for promoting informed decisions about lung cancer screening: Implementation of a PCORI study protocol and lessons learned. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 09; 72:26-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.642
  5. Shared decision-making conversations and smoking cessation interventions: critical components of low-dose CT lung cancer screening programs. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Jun; 7(3):254-271.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.636
  6. A brief measure of Smokers' knowledge of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. Prev Med Rep. 2016 Dec; 4:351-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.560
  7. Tobacco quitline staffs' knowledge and attitudes about connecting quitline callers to lung cancer screening educational materials. Cancer Med. 2024 Jul; 13(13):e7443.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  8. Impact of the shared decision-making process on lung cancer screening decisions. Cancer Med. 2022 02; 11(3):790-797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  9. Factors Associated With Obtaining Lung Cancer Screening Among Persons Who Smoke. MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jul-Dec; 6(2):23814683211067810.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  10. Factors that influence clinicians' decisions to decrease active surveillance monitoring frequency or transition to watchful waiting for localised prostate cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2021 11 12; 11(11):e048347.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  11. Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening: How Well Are We "Sharing"? Chest. 2021 07; 160(1):330-340.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  12. Implementation of Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening Among the Privately Insured Nonelderly. MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jan-Jun; 6(1):2381468320984773.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  13. Smoking cessation and shared decision-making practices about lung cancer screening among primary care providers. Cancer Med. 2021 02; 10(4):1357-1365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  14. Patient Adherence to Screening for Lung Cancer in the US: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 11 02; 3(11):e2025102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  15. Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making by Persons Who Smoke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 01 03; 3(1):e1920362.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  16. A Review of the Presentation of Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids. MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Jul-Dec; 4(2):2381468319881447.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  17. Patients' information needs and attitudes about post-treatment surveillance for colorectal cancer in the United States: a multi-perspective, mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2019 08 15; 9(8):e025888.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  18. Responsiveness of a Brief Measure of Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge. J Cancer Educ. 2018 08; 33(4):842-846.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  19. Communication about geriatric assessment domains in advanced cancer settings: "Missed opportunities". J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 01; 10(1):68-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  20. Using a Patient Decision Aid Video to Assess Current and Former Smokers' Values About the Harms and Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography. MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Jan-Jun; 3(1):2381468318769886.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  21. Limitations of the S-TOFHLA in measuring poor numeracy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018 03 27; 18(1):405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  22. An entertainment-education colorectal cancer screening decision aid for African American patients: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2017 Apr 15; 123(8):1401-1408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  23. The TELEhealth Shared decision-making COaching and navigation in Primary carE (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators. BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 18; 25(1):373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  24. The TELEhealth Shared decision-making Coaching and Navigation in Primary carE (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators. Res Sq. 2024 Apr 22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  25. Implementing a Telehealth Shared Counseling and Decision-Making Visit for Lung Cancer Screening in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Fed Pract. 2023 Aug; 40(Suppl 3):S83-S90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  26. Patients' Preferences for Androgen Deprivation Therapy in the Treatment of Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer. MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Jul-Dec; 7(2):23814683221137752.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  27. Short-form adaptive measure of financial toxicity from the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) study: Derivation using modern psychometric techniques. PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  28. Predicting Risk of Recurrence After Colorectal Cancer Surgery in the United States: An Analysis of a Special Commission on Cancer National Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 27(8):2740-2749.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  29. Engaging patients in the uptake, understanding, and use of evidence: Addressing barriers and facilitators of successful engagement. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 01; 100(1):4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.