Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by UWE TITT and DRAGAN MIRKOVIC.
Connection Strength
1.695
-
Erratum: "Monte Carlo simulations of 3 He ion physical characteristics in a water phantom and evaluation of radiobiological effectiveness" [Med. Phys. 43 (2), page range 761-776(2016)]. Med Phys. 2018 Mar; 45(3):1301.
Score: 0.156
-
Erratum: "Analysis of the track- and dose-averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code" [Med. Phys. 42 (11), page range 6234-6247(2015)]. Med Phys. 2018 Mar; 45(3):1302.
Score: 0.156
-
Monte Carlo simulations of ?He ion physical characteristics in a water phantom and evaluation of radiobiological effectiveness. Med Phys. 2016 Feb; 43(2):761-76.
Score: 0.135
-
Analysis of the track- and dose-averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code. Med Phys. 2015 Nov; 42(11):6234-47.
Score: 0.133
-
Degradation of proton depth dose distributions attributable to microstructures in lung-equivalent material. Med Phys. 2015 Nov; 42(11):6425-32.
Score: 0.133
-
SU-E-T-435: Automatic Monte Carlo Dose Calculations of Proton Treatment Plans. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3805.
Score: 0.105
-
SU-E-T-474: Monte Carlo Phase Space Production to Model Magnetically Scanned Proton Beams for IMPT. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3814.
Score: 0.105
-
SU-E-T-484: Potential Clinical Impact of Dosimetric Uncertainties in Proton Therapy. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3816.
Score: 0.105
-
Application of a fast proton dose calculation algorithm to a thorax geometry. Radiat Meas. 2010 Dec 01; 45(10):1367-1368.
Score: 0.094
-
Adjustment of the lateral and longitudinal size of scanned proton beam spots using a pre-absorber to optimize penumbrae and delivery efficiency. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 07; 55(23):7097-106.
Score: 0.094
-
An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle. Med Phys. 2010 Sep; 37(9):4960-70.
Score: 0.093
-
Fixed- versus Variable-RBE Computations for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan-Mar; 4(1):156-167.
Score: 0.041
-
Comparison of Monte Carlo and analytical dose computations for intensity modulated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2018 02 09; 63(4):045003.
Score: 0.039
-
Differences in Normal Tissue Response in the Esophagus Between Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using In?Vivo Imaging Biomarkers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 11 15; 99(4):1013-1020.
Score: 0.037
-
Clinical evidence of variable proton biological effectiveness in pediatric patients treated for ependymoma. Radiother Oncol. 2016 12; 121(3):395-401.
Score: 0.036
-
Validation of a track repeating algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy: clinical cases study. Phys Med Biol. 2016 Apr 07; 61(7):2633-45.
Score: 0.034
-
Spatial mapping of the biologic effectiveness of scanned particle beams: towards biologically optimized particle therapy. Sci Rep. 2015 May 18; 5:9850.
Score: 0.032
-
LET dependence of the response of EBT2 films in proton dosimetry modeled as a bimolecular chemical reaction. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Dec 07; 58(23):8477-91.
Score: 0.029
-
Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams. Radiat Meas. 2013 Nov 01; 58:37-44.
Score: 0.029
-
WE-E-BRB-02: Evaluation of Analytical Proton Dose Predictions with a Lung-Like Plastic Phantom. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part27):3956.
Score: 0.026
-
Monte Carlo investigation of the low-dose envelope from scanned proton pencil beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Feb 07; 55(3):711-21.
Score: 0.022
-
REDUCING STRAY RADIATION DOSE FOR A PEDIATRIC PATIENT RECEIVING PROTON CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION. Nucl Technol. 2009 Oct 01; 168(1):108-112.
Score: 0.022
-
Density heterogeneities and the influence of multiple Coulomb and nuclear scatterings on the Bragg peak distal edge of proton therapy beams. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 07; 53(17):4605-19.
Score: 0.020
-
Reducing stray radiation dose to patients receiving passively scattered proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Apr 21; 53(8):2131-47.
Score: 0.020