Header Logo
Last Name


TitleAssociate Professor
InstitutionMD Anderson
DepartmentImaging Physics
vCardDownload vCard

    Collapse ORNG Applications 
    Collapse Verify Publications

    Collapse Bibliographic 
    Collapse selected publications
    Publications listed below are automatically derived from MEDLINE/PubMed and other sources, which might result in incorrect or missing publications. Faculty can login to make corrections and additions.
    List All   |   Timeline
    1. Einstein SA, Rong XJ, Jensen CT, Liu X. Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jan; 21(1):174-178. PMID: 31859454.
      View in: PubMed
    2. Ghani MU, Ren L, Wong M, Li Y, Zheng B, Rong XJ, Yang K, Liu H. Noise Power Characteristics of a Micro-Computed Tomography System. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Jan; 41(1):82-89. PMID: 27680419.
      View in: PubMed
    3. Wait JM, Cody D, Jones AK, Rong J, Baladandayuthapani V, Kappadath SC. Performance Evaluation of Material Decomposition With Rapid-Kilovoltage-Switching Dual-Energy CT and Implications for Assessing Bone Mineral Density. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jun; 204(6):1234-41. PMID: 26001233.
      View in: PubMed
    4. Mueller JW, Vining DJ, Jones AK, Followill D, Johnson VE, Bhosale P, Rong J, Cody DD. In vivo CT dosimetry during CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Apr; 202(4):703-10. PMID: 24660695.
      View in: PubMed
    5. Greene TC, Rong XJ. Evaluation of techniques for slice sensitivity profile measurement and analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Mar 06; 15(2):4042. PMID: 24710429.
      View in: PubMed
    6. Akyalcin S, English JD, Abramovitch KM, Rong XJ. Measurement of skin dose from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Head Face Med. 2013 Oct 09; 9:28. PMID: 24192155.
      View in: PubMed
    7. Nute JL, Rong J, Stevens DM, Darensbourg BJ, Cheng J, Wei W, Hobbs BP, Cody DD. Evaluation of over 100 scanner-years of computed tomography daily quality control data. Med Phys. 2013 May; 40(5):051908. PMID: 23635278.
      View in: PubMed
    8. Tamm EP, Rong XJ, Cody DD, Ernst RD, Fitzgerald NE, Kundra V. Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality. Radiographics. 2011 Nov-Dec; 31(7):1823-32. PMID: 21969662.
      View in: PubMed
    9. Hulme KW, Rong J, Chasen B, Chuang HH, Cody DD, Wong FC, Kappadath SC. A CT acquisition technique to generate images at various dose levels for prospective dose reduction studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb; 196(2):W144-51. PMID: 21257855.
      View in: PubMed
    10. Zhang D, Rong J, Chen WR, Gao F, Xu K, Wu X, Liu H. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Jan; 54(1):69-73. PMID: 17260857.
      View in: PubMed
    11. Zhang Q, Rong J, Wu X, Li Y, Chen WR, Liu H. Impacts of Filtration on Contrast-Detail Detectability of an X-ray Imaging System. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2006; 2006:95754. PMID: 23165063.
      View in: PubMed
    12. Rong XJ, Krugh KT, Shepard SJ, Geiser WR. Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors. Med Phys. 2003 Jul; 30(7):1768-75. PMID: 12906194.
      View in: PubMed
    13. Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Johnston DA, Lemacks MR, Liu X, Whitman GJ, Dryden MJ, Stephens TW, Thompson SK, Krugh KT, Lai CJ. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film). Med Phys. 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PMID: 12349926.
      View in: PubMed
    14. Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Liu X, Lemacks MR, Thompson SK. Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems--a contrast-detail phantom study. Med Phys. 2001 Nov; 28(11):2328-35. PMID: 11764040.
      View in: PubMed
    15. El-Mohri Y, Antonuk LE, Zhao Q, Maolinbay M, Rong X, Jee KW, Nassif S, Cionca C. A quantitative investigation of additive noise reduction for active matrix flat-panel imagers using compensation lines. Med Phys. 2000 Aug; 27(8):1855-64. PMID: 10984232.
      View in: PubMed
    16. Maolinbay M, El-Mohri Y, Antonuk LE, Jee KW, Nassif S, Rong X, Zhao Q. Additive noise properties of active matrix flat-panel imagers. Med Phys. 2000 Aug; 27(8):1841-54. PMID: 10984231.
      View in: PubMed
    17. Antonuk LE, Jee KW, El-Mohri Y, Maolinbay M, Nassif S, Rong X, Zhao Q, Siewerdsen JH, Street RA, Shah KS. Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications. Med Phys. 2000 Feb; 27(2):289-306. PMID: 10718132.
      View in: PubMed
    18. Rong X, Kutikkad K, Langhorst SM. A comparison of results for the University of Missouri Research Reactor radiological airborne release assessments obtained from PC-based computer programs. Health Phys. 1995 Jun; 68(6):845-50. PMID: 7759266.
      View in: PubMed
    19. Performance evaluation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for achieving CT radiation dose reduction - A phantom study. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 17:511-531.
    20. Evaluation of Abdominal Computed Tomography Image Quality Using a New Version of Vendor-Specific Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.
    21. Comparison of a-Si. 381-388.
    22. Optimizing photon fluence measurements for the accurate determination of detective quantum efficiency. Journal of Electronic Imaging. 18.
    23. A large-area, 97 μm pitch, indirect-detection, active matrix, flat-panel imager (AMFPI). 2-13.
    24. Comparison of a CMOS-based and a CCD-based digital x-ray imaging system. Journal of Electronic Imaging. 14:1-6.
    25. Comparison of mammographic imaging systems in detection of simulated microcalcifications. Journal of Digital Imaging. 16:109.
    26. A noise power spectrum study of a new model-based iterative reconstruction system. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 17:428-439.
    27. Effects of pixel/aperture sizes on image properties in digital mammography. 159-166.
    28. Comparison of a-Si. 389-398.
    29. Imaging characteristics of a high resolution computed radiography system. Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology. 14:273-282.
    30. Evaluation of techniques for slice sensitivity profile measurement and analysis. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 15:281-294.
    31. Beyond the limits of present active matrix, flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology. 518-527.
    32. DQE measurements in magnification X-ray imaging. Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology. 14:141-150.
    33. Measurements of imaging parameters of a phase contrast x-ray imaging prototype.
    34. Error analysis in the measurement of X-ray photon fluence.
    35. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.
    36. Phantom imaging with a prototype phase contrast radiography system.
    37. Correction of Motion Artifacts From Shuttle Mode Computed Tomography Acquisitions for Body Perfusion Imaging Applications. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.
    38. Improved spatial resolution in flat-panel imaging systems. 556-563.
    39. Dose reduction in CT urography and vasculature phantom studies using model-based iterative reconstruction. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 17:334-342.
    40. Optimization of MTF and DQE in magnification radiography - a theoretical analysis. 466-475.
    RONG's Networks
    Click the "See All" links for more information and interactive visualizations!
    Concepts Expand Description
    Co-Authors Expand Description
    Similar People Expand Description
    Same Department Expand Description