Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by CHARLES E BUTLER and PATRICK BRYAN GARVEY.
CHARLES E BUTLER
Connection Strength
8.425
PATRICK BRYAN GARVEY
  1. Long-Term Outcomes after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar; 224(3):341-350.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.577
  2. Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov; 219(5):853-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.487
  3. Reply: To PMID 24083910. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May; 218(5):1081-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.481
  4. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.473
  5. Complex reconstruction of desmoid tumor resections does not increase desmoid tumor recurrence. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Sep; 217(3):472-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  6. Violation of the rectus complex is not a contraindication to component separation for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Feb; 214(2):131-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.407
  7. Perfusion-related complications are similar for DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps harvested on medial or lateral deep inferior epigastric Artery branch perforators for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec; 128(6):581e-589e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.407
  8. Abdominal donor-site outcomes for medial versus lateral deep inferior epigastric artery branch perforator harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun; 127(6):2198-2205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.393
  9. Reconstructive strategies for partial sacrectomy defects based on surgical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jan; 127(1):190-199.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.382
  10. Component Separation Decreases Hernia Recurrence Rates in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Biologic Mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Mar 01; 153(3):717-726.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  11. A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Different Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 11 01; 150(5):955-962.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  12. A Randomized Prospective Time and Motion Comparison of Techniques to Process Autologous Fat Grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 01; 147(5):1035-1044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  13. Authors' response to: "Comment on the impact of sarcopenia on oncologic abdominal wall reconstruction". J Surg Oncol. 2021 02; 123(2):696-697.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  14. Oncologic Safety and Surveillance of Autologous Fat Grafting following Breast Conservation Therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 08; 146(2):215-225.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  15. Synthetic Mesh Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix for Oncologic Chest Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 27(8):3009-3017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  16. Obesity and Breast Reconstruction: Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 03; 145(3):481e-490e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  17. A Prospective Pilot Study Comparing Rate of Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Grafting. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 02 15; 39(3):331-337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  18. Immediate Reconstruction of Complex Spinal Wounds Is Associated with Increased Hardware Retention and Fewer Wound-related Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Jan; 7(1):e2076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  19. Aseptic Freeze-Dried versus Sterile Wet-Packaged Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 05; 141(5):624e-632e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  20. Hospital readmission following open, single-stage, elective abdominal wall reconstructions using acellular dermal matrix affects long-term hernia recurrence rate. Am J Surg. 2018 07; 216(1):60-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  21. Smaller Diameter Anastomotic Coupling Devices Have Higher Rates of Venous Thrombosis in Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec; 140(6):1293-1300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  22. Concomitant Panniculectomy Affects Wound Morbidity but Not Hernia Recurrence Rates in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec; 140(6):1263-1273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  23. Using a Second Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap after Repeated Mandibulectomy Is Associated with a Low Complication Rate and Acceptable Functional Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Aug; 140(2):381-389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  24. The Impact of Body Mass Index on Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Outcomes: A Comparative Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May; 139(5):1234-1244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  25. Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Concomitant Ostomy-Associated Hernia Repair: Outcomes and Propensity Score Analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar; 224(3):351-361.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  26. Advanced age does not affect abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes using acellular dermal matrix: A comparative study using propensity score analysis. Am J Surg. 2017 Jun; 213(6):1046-1052.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  27. Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis. Surgery. 2017 02; 161(2):499-508.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  28. Prior Radiotherapy Does Not Affect Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Outcomes: Evidence from Propensity Score Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar; 24(3):816-822.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  29. Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul; 136(1):10-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  30. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  31. Optimizing reconstruction of oncologic sternectomy defects based on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Aug; 217(2):306-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  32. Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan; 131(1):71-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  33. Tracking the learning curve in microsurgical skill acquisition. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Oct; 130(4):550e-557e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  34. Ensuring Safety While Achieving Beauty: An Evidence-Based Approach to Optimizing Mastectomy and Autologous Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients with Obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 09 01; 237(3):441-451.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  35. The Effect of Lipoaspirate Processing Technique on Complications in Autologous Fat Grafting for Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 09 14; 41(10):NP1303-NP1309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  36. The Profunda Artery Perforator Flap: A Versatile Option for Head and Neck Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 01; 147(6):1401-1412.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  37. Is Tissue Expansion Worth It? Comparative Outcomes of Skin-preserving versus Delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Nov; 8(11):e3217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  38. The impact of sarcopenia on oncologic abdominal wall reconstruction. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec; 122(7):1490-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  39. Reconstruction of massive chest wall defects: A 20-year experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Jun; 73(6):1091-1098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  40. Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction with Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 02 15; 39(3):279-288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  41. Outcome Analysis of Free Flap Salvage in Outpatients Presenting with Microvascular Compromise. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 01; 141(1):20e-27e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  42. Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Tissue Expander/Implant Reconstruction: 2-Year Risks and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Prospective, Multicenter Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov; 140(5):869-877.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  43. Interview Scores Correlate with Fellow Microsurgical Skill and Performance. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Mar; 34(3):211-217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  44. A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Visible Light Spectroscopy to Handheld Doppler for Postoperative Free Tissue Transfer Monitoring. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep; 140(3):604-613.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  45. U.S. Epidemiology of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May; 139(5):1042-1050.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  46. Salvaging the Infected Breast Tissue Expander: A Standardized Multidisciplinary Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jun; 4(6):e732.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  47. Pelvic reconstruction with pedicled thigh flaps: indications, surgical techniques, and postoperative imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar; 202(3):593-601.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.