Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by CHARLES E BUTLER and DONALD P BAUMANN.
CHARLES E BUTLER
Connection Strength
7.392
DONALD P BAUMANN
  1. Discussion: Wound Morbidity in Minimally Invasive Anterior Component Separation Compared to Transversus Abdominis Release. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 02; 139(2):480-481.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.578
  2. Discussion: Postoperative Flank Defects, Hernias, and Bulges: A Reliable Method for Repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar; 137(3):1002-1003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.542
  3. Soft tissue coverage in abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Oct; 93(5):1199-209.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.459
  4. Bioprosthetic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2012 Feb; 26(1):18-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.409
  5. Lateral abdominal wall reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2012 Feb; 26(1):40-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.409
  6. Component separation improves outcomes in VRAM flap donor sites with excessive fascial tension. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov; 126(5):1573-1580.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.375
  7. Surgical Outcomes of Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Pelvic Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Nov 01; 154(5):1105-1114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  8. Component Separation Decreases Hernia Recurrence Rates in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Biologic Mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Mar 01; 153(3):717-726.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  9. A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Different Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 11 01; 150(5):955-962.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  10. A Randomized Prospective Time and Motion Comparison of Techniques to Process Autologous Fat Grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 01; 147(5):1035-1044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  11. Acellular Dermal Matrix Provides Durable Long-Term Outcomes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Study of Patients with Over 60 Months of Follow-up. Ann Surg. 2022 11 01; 276(5):e563-e570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  12. Soft-Tissue Reconstruction after Composite Vertebrectomy and Chest Wall Resection for Spinal Tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 05; 145(5):1275-1286.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  13. Building a Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Academic Lymphedema Program. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar; 8(3):e2670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  14. Synthetic Mesh Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix for Oncologic Chest Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 27(8):3009-3017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  15. Surgical Outcomes in Lateral Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 09; 229(3):267-276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  16. Immediate Reconstruction of Complex Spinal Wounds Is Associated with Increased Hardware Retention and Fewer Wound-related Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Jan; 7(1):e2076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  17. Reconstruction of the Abdominal Wall after Oncologic Resection: Defect Classification and Management Strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 09; 142(3 Suppl):187S-196S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  18. Hospital readmission following open, single-stage, elective abdominal wall reconstructions using acellular dermal matrix affects long-term hernia recurrence rate. Am J Surg. 2018 07; 216(1):60-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  19. Outcome Analysis of Free Flap Salvage in Outpatients Presenting with Microvascular Compromise. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 01; 141(1):20e-27e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  20. Concomitant Panniculectomy Affects Wound Morbidity but Not Hernia Recurrence Rates in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec; 140(6):1263-1273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  21. The Impact of Body Mass Index on Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Outcomes: A Comparative Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May; 139(5):1234-1244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  22. Long-Term Outcomes after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar; 224(3):341-350.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  23. Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Concomitant Ostomy-Associated Hernia Repair: Outcomes and Propensity Score Analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar; 224(3):351-361.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  24. Advanced age does not affect abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes using acellular dermal matrix: A comparative study using propensity score analysis. Am J Surg. 2017 Jun; 213(6):1046-1052.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  25. Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis. Surgery. 2017 02; 161(2):499-508.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  26. Prior Radiotherapy Does Not Affect Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Outcomes: Evidence from Propensity Score Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar; 24(3):816-822.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  27. Salvaging the Infected Breast Tissue Expander: A Standardized Multidisciplinary Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jun; 4(6):e732.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  28. Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov; 219(5):853-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  29. Reply: To PMID 24083910. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May; 218(5):1081-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  30. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  31. Complex reconstruction of desmoid tumor resections does not increase desmoid tumor recurrence. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Sep; 217(3):472-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  32. Optimizing reconstruction of oncologic sternectomy defects based on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Aug; 217(2):306-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  33. Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan; 131(1):71-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  34. Minimally invasive component separation results in fewer wound-healing complications than open component separation for large ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jun; 214(6):981-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  35. Violation of the rectus complex is not a contraindication to component separation for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Feb; 214(2):131-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  36. Allograft vs Xenograft Bioprosthetic Mesh in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Blinded Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 11 12; 41(12):NP1931-NP1939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  37. Is Tissue Expansion Worth It? Comparative Outcomes of Skin-preserving versus Delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Nov; 8(11):e3217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  38. Reconstruction of massive chest wall defects: A 20-year experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Jun; 73(6):1091-1098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  39. Aseptic Freeze-Dried versus Sterile Wet-Packaged Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 05; 141(5):624e-632e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.