Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JEFFREY E LEE and HUAMIN WANG.
Connection Strength
1.830
-
Expression and clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptor and insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2015 Sep; 46(9):1315-22.
Score: 0.131
-
The expression of PTEN is associated with improved prognosis in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Nov; 137(11):1619-26.
Score: 0.117
-
Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and histological changes in non-neoplastic pancreas associated with neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Histopathology. 2013 Dec; 63(6):841-51.
Score: 0.116
-
Loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog expression is associated with recurrence and poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2013 Jun; 44(6):1024-30.
Score: 0.111
-
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas with prominent atypical multinucleated giant tumour cells. Histopathology. 2013 Feb; 62(3):465-71.
Score: 0.110
-
Overexpression of protein phosphatase 4 correlates with poor prognosis in patients with stage II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Aug; 21(8):1336-43.
Score: 0.106
-
Tumor invasion of muscular vessels predicts poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who have received neoadjuvant therapy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Apr; 36(4):552-9.
Score: 0.105
-
Perineural and intraneural invasion in posttherapy pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens predicts poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Mar; 36(3):409-17.
Score: 0.105
-
Histologic tumor involvement of superior mesenteric vein/portal vein predicts poor prognosis in patients with stage II pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Cancer. 2012 Aug 01; 118(15):3801-11.
Score: 0.103
-
Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with a better prognosis. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2012 Jan; 16(1):29-37.
Score: 0.102
-
Histologic grading of the extent of residual carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a predictor for patient outcome. Cancer. 2012 Jun 15; 118(12):3182-90.
Score: 0.102
-
Post-therapy pathologic stage and survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Cancer. 2012 Jan 01; 118(1):268-77.
Score: 0.100
-
Superior Mesenteric Artery Margin of Posttherapy Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Prognosis in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Oct; 39(10):1395-403.
Score: 0.034
-
Intra-tumoral heterogeneity of gemcitabine delivery and mass transport in human pancreatic cancer. Phys Biol. 2014 Nov 26; 11(6):065002.
Score: 0.032
-
Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with a reduced lymph node ratio in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr; 22(4):1168-75.
Score: 0.031
-
Transport properties of pancreatic cancer describe gemcitabine delivery and response. J Clin Invest. 2014 Apr; 124(4):1525-36.
Score: 0.030
-
Treatment sequencing for resectable pancreatic cancer: influence of early metastases and surgical complications on multimodality therapy completion and survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jan; 18(1):16-24; discussion 24-5.
Score: 0.029
-
Radiographic tumor-vein interface as a predictor of intraoperative, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Feb; 18(2):269-78; discussion 278.
Score: 0.029
-
Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 represents a marker of response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2014 May; 16(5):430-8.
Score: 0.029
-
A retrospective study of ampullary adenocarcinomas: overall survival and responsiveness to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep; 24(9):2349-53.
Score: 0.028
-
Selective reoperation for locally recurrent or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following primary pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Sep; 16(9):1696-704.
Score: 0.027
-
Response of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer to neoadjuvant therapy is not reflected by radiographic indicators. Cancer. 2012 Dec 01; 118(23):5749-56.
Score: 0.027
-
Achieving eugastrinemia in MEN1 patients: both duodenal inspection and formal lymph node dissection are important. Surgery. 2011 Dec; 150(6):1143-52.
Score: 0.026
-
Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical technique on recurrence of localized pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jan; 16(1):68-78; discussion 78-9.
Score: 0.026
-
Serum CA 19-9 as a marker of resectability and survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul; 17(7):1794-801.
Score: 0.023
-
Long-term survival after multidisciplinary management of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Apr; 16(4):836-47.
Score: 0.021
-
Preoperative gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20; 26(21):3487-95.
Score: 0.020
-
Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20; 26(21):3496-502.
Score: 0.020
-
Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007 Jul; 246(1):52-60.
Score: 0.019
-
The learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2007 May; 141(5):694-701.
Score: 0.019
-
The learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2007 Apr; 141(4):456-63.
Score: 0.018
-
Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Aug; 13(8):1035-46.
Score: 0.018
-
Carcinoid tumors of the duodenum. Surgery. 2005 Dec; 138(6):971-7; discussion 977-8.
Score: 0.017